CBGZF
Price
$0.31
Change
+$0.02 (+6.90%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
85.56M
USGDF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBGZF vs USGDF

Header iconCBGZF vs USGDF Comparison
Open Charts CBGZF vs USGDFBanner chart's image
Cabral Gold
Price$0.31
Change+$0.02 (+6.90%)
Volume$289.18K
Capitalization85.56M
American Pacific Mining
Price$0.14
Change+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Volume$509.75K
Capitalization30.08M
CBGZF vs USGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBGZF vs. USGDF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBGZF is a Hold and USGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CBGZF: $0.31 vs. USGDF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: CBGZF and USGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBGZF: 119% vs. USGDF: 82%
Market capitalization -- CBGZF: $85.56M vs. USGDF: $30.08M
CBGZF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $85.56M. USGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $30.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBGZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSGDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBGZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, USGDF is a better buy in the long-term than CBGZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBGZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USGDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBGZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • USGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USGDF is a better buy in the short-term than CBGZF.

Price Growth

CBGZF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.12% price change this week, while USGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6065.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBGZF($85.6M) has a higher market cap than USGDF($30.1M). CBGZF has higher P/E ratio than USGDF: CBGZF (31.14) vs USGDF (19.10). CBGZF YTD gains are higher at: 92.146 vs. USGDF (-1.429). USGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.14M vs. CBGZF (-9.92M). CBGZF has more cash in the bank: 14.3M vs. USGDF (6.19M). CBGZF (0) and USGDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CBGZFUSGDFCBGZF / USGDF
Capitalization85.6M30.1M284%
EBITDA-9.92M2.14M-465%
Gain YTD92.146-1.429-6,450%
P/E Ratio31.1419.10163%
Revenue00-
Total Cash14.3M6.19M231%
Total DebtN/A1.74M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBGZF vs USGDF: Fundamental Ratings
CBGZF
USGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1175
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
9992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1410
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a16

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

USGDF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as CBGZF (76). This means that USGDF’s stock grew similarly to CBGZF’s over the last 12 months.

CBGZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as USGDF (100). This means that CBGZF’s stock grew similarly to USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

USGDF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CBGZF (99). This means that USGDF’s stock grew similarly to CBGZF’s over the last 12 months.

CBGZF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as USGDF (63). This means that CBGZF’s stock grew similarly to USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

USGDF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as CBGZF (14). This means that USGDF’s stock grew similarly to CBGZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBGZFUSGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CWSRF14.13N/A
N/A
Chartwell Retirement Residences
SRRTF10.50N/A
N/A
SLATE GROCERY REIT
TELNY16.20N/A
N/A
Telenor ASA
VACBF0.20N/A
N/A
NYKODE THERAPEUTICS AS
LNCLF0.12N/A
N/A
Lincoln Gold Mng Inc.

CBGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBGZF and ELRRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBGZF and ELRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBGZF
1D Price
Change %
CBGZF100%
+5.70%
ELRRF - CBGZF
28%
Poorly correlated
+24.35%
BCEKF - CBGZF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
VAUCF - CBGZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.65%
PROBF - CBGZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
WDOFF - CBGZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
More

USGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USGDF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USGDF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USGDF
1D Price
Change %
USGDF100%
N/A
NSUPF - USGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCEKF - USGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBGZF - USGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLCJF - USGDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGMIF - USGDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More