CBFV
Price
$31.94
Change
+$0.13 (+0.41%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
159.24M
4 days until earnings call
UNB
Price
$24.34
Change
-$0.25 (-1.02%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
110.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs UNB

Header iconCBFV vs UNB Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs UNBBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$31.94
Change+$0.13 (+0.41%)
Volume$5.68K
Capitalization159.24M
Union Bankshares
Price$24.34
Change-$0.25 (-1.02%)
Volume$20.77K
Capitalization110.78M
CBFV vs UNB Comparison Chart in %
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. UNB commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Hold and UNB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $31.94 vs. UNB: $24.34)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and UNB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 48% vs. UNB: 229%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $159.24M vs. UNB: $110.78M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $159.24M. UNB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $110.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUNB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UNB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than UNB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UNB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than UNB.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.84% price change this week, while UNB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBFV($159M) has a higher market cap than UNB($111M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than UNB: CBFV (14.93) vs UNB (12.11). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 14.562 vs. UNB (-12.894). CBFV has less debt than UNB: CBFV (34.7M) vs UNB (287M). CBFV (49.3M) and UNB (49M) have equivalent revenues.
CBFVUNBCBFV / UNB
Capitalization159M111M143%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.562-12.894-113%
P/E Ratio14.9312.11123%
Revenue49.3M49M101%
Total CashN/A4.77M-
Total Debt34.7M287M12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs UNB: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
UNB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8528
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1658
SMR RATING
1..100
5949
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5078
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
755
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNB's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (66). This means that UNB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNB (58). This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNB’s over the last 12 months.

UNB's SMR Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (59). This means that UNB’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UNB (78). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to UNB’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNB (55). This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVUNB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PREKF17.700.22
+1.27%
Prairiesky Royalty Ltd.
SECVY19.20N/A
N/A
Seche Environment
KSTBF0.05N/A
N/A
Kestrel Gold, Inc.
TELNF16.81N/A
N/A
Telenor ASA
NRRSF0.70-0.08
-10.77%
Norsemont Mining Inc.

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+0.41%
WNEB - CBFV
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
FRAF - CBFV
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
FUNC - CBFV
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
BVFL - CBFV
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
MRBK - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
More

UNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNB has been loosely correlated with CFFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNB jumps, then CFFI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNB
1D Price
Change %
UNB100%
-1.02%
CFFI - UNB
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
FXNC - UNB
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
FUNC - UNB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
CBFV - UNB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
LARK - UNB
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
More