CBFV
Price
$29.25
Change
+$0.66 (+2.31%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
111.19M
17 days until earnings call
TRUX
Price
$78.45
Change
-$1.05 (-1.32%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
173.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs TRUX

Header iconCBFV vs TRUX Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs TRUXBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$29.25
Change+$0.66 (+2.31%)
Volume$7.82K
Capitalization111.19M
Truxton
Price$78.45
Change-$1.05 (-1.32%)
Volume$215
Capitalization173.89M
CBFV vs TRUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. TRUX commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Hold and TRUX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $29.25 vs. TRUX: $78.45)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and TRUX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 28% vs. TRUX: 20%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $111.19M vs. TRUX: $173.89M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $111.19M. TRUX’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $173.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRUX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRUX is a better buy in the long-term than CBFV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRUX’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TRUX’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than TRUX.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.67% price change this week, while TRUX (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRUX($174M) has a higher market cap than CBFV($111M). TRUX YTD gains are higher at: 9.060 vs. CBFV (4.059).
CBFVTRUXCBFV / TRUX
Capitalization111M174M64%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.0599.06045%
P/E Ratio4.89N/A-
Revenue42.4MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt34.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs TRUX: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
TRUX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5114
SMR RATING
1..100
525
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
447
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBFV's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRUX (95) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

TRUX's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TRUX’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

TRUX's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TRUX’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

TRUX's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CBFV (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TRUX’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRUX (47) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVTRUX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
29%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RCKSX21.450.25
+1.18%
Rock Oak Core Growth
OEGYX34.800.40
+1.16%
Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth Y
CSVFX21.820.13
+0.60%
Columbia International Div Inc Inst
LCMNX8.900.05
+0.56%
Miller Income C
IBNAX24.960.12
+0.48%
Macquarie Balanced Fund Class A

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with CMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then CMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+2.31%
CMA - CBFV
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
WSFS - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
PNFP - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
WBS - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
FIBK - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
More

TRUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRUX and LFGP have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRUX and LFGP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRUX
1D Price
Change %
TRUX100%
N/A
LFGP - TRUX
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - TRUX
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBO - TRUX
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBFV - TRUX
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
TRCY - TRUX
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
More