CBFV
Price
$36.52
Change
+$0.91 (+2.56%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
183M
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRUX
Price
$82.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 1 closing price
Capitalization
235.16M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs TRUX

Header iconCBFV vs TRUX Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs TRUXBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$36.52
Change+$0.91 (+2.56%)
Volume$9.35K
Capitalization183M
Truxton
Price$82.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.74K
Capitalization235.16M
CBFV vs TRUX Comparison Chart in %
CBFV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRUX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. TRUX commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a StrongBuy and TRUX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $35.56 vs. TRUX: $82.00)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and TRUX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 29% vs. TRUX: 153%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $183M vs. TRUX: $238.03M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $183M. TRUX’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $238.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRUX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CBFV and TRUX are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRUX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRUX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than TRUX.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.28% price change this week, while TRUX (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRUX($235M) has a higher market cap than CBFV($183M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than TRUX: CBFV (70.23) vs TRUX (12.93). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 27.547 vs. TRUX (14.694). CBFV (49.3M) and TRUX (47.5M) have equivalent revenues.
CBFVTRUXCBFV / TRUX
Capitalization183M235M78%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.54714.694187%
P/E Ratio70.2312.93543%
Revenue49.3M47.5M104%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt34.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs TRUX: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
TRUX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1215
SMR RATING
1..100
5942
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
240
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRUX's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CBFV (95) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TRUX’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRUX (15) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

TRUX's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CBFV (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TRUX’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRUX (52) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRUX (40) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVTRUX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
26%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRUX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HMRZF19.50N/A
N/A
Hennes & Mauritz AB
CBGPY11.02N/A
N/A
Close Brothers Group Plc
KLIB140.00N/A
N/A
Killbuck Bancshares Inc.
AHICF18.55N/A
N/A
Asahi Intec Co., Ltd.
WPNDF0.11N/A
N/A
Wishpond Technologies Ltd.

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+0.88%
WNEB - CBFV
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
SFST - CBFV
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
CCNE - CBFV
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
GBCI - CBFV
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
FRAF - CBFV
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
More

TRUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRUX and MNBO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRUX and MNBO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRUX
1D Price
Change %
TRUX100%
N/A
MNBO - TRUX
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFGP - TRUX
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - TRUX
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBFV - TRUX
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
TKGBY - TRUX
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More