CBFV
Price
$33.49
Change
-$0.47 (-1.38%)
Updated
Sep 29, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
169.31M
24 days until earnings call
TRUX
Price
$80.00
Change
-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
229.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs TRUX

Header iconCBFV vs TRUX Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs TRUXBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$33.49
Change-$0.47 (-1.38%)
Volume$100
Capitalization169.31M
Truxton
Price$80.00
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Volume$2.12K
Capitalization229.43M
CBFV vs TRUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. TRUX commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Hold and TRUX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $33.96 vs. TRUX: $80.00)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and TRUX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 54% vs. TRUX: 204%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $169.31M vs. TRUX: $229.43M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $169.31M. TRUX’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $229.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRUX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CBFV and TRUX are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRUX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TRUX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than TRUX.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while TRUX (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.17% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRUX($229M) has a higher market cap than CBFV($169M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than TRUX: CBFV (15.87) vs TRUX (12.62). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 21.808 vs. TRUX (11.897).
CBFVTRUXCBFV / TRUX
Capitalization169M229M74%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.80811.897183%
P/E Ratio15.8712.62126%
Revenue49.3MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt34.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs TRUX: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
TRUX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1218
SMR RATING
1..100
594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
744
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2241

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBFV's Valuation (68) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRUX (69) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRUX (18) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

TRUX's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TRUX’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRUX (53) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRUX (44) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVTRUX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
27%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BDRFY20.690.22
+1.09%
Beiersdorf AG
AXVEF0.15N/A
N/A
CDN MAVERICK CAP CORP.
BDVSF14.05N/A
N/A
Bidvest Group Ltd.
PRRCF9.29N/A
N/A
Procredit Holding Ag
APXIF11.85-0.05
-0.42%
APx Acquisition Corp. I

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+0.21%
WNEB - CBFV
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
MRBK - CBFV
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
BVFL - CBFV
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
FUNC - CBFV
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
BFIN - CBFV
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More

TRUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRUX and LFGP have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRUX and LFGP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRUX
1D Price
Change %
TRUX100%
N/A
LFGP - TRUX
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - TRUX
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBO - TRUX
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBFV - TRUX
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
TRCY - TRUX
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More