CBFV
Price
$35.14
Change
-$0.03 (-0.09%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
176.08M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFST
Price
$52.89
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
433.13M
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs SFST

Header iconCBFV vs SFST Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs SFSTBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$35.14
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
Volume$2.43K
Capitalization176.08M
Southern First Bancshares
Price$52.89
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$14.39K
Capitalization433.13M
CBFV vs SFST Comparison Chart in %
CBFV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. SFST commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a StrongBuy and SFST is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $35.14 vs. SFST: $52.89)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and SFST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 32% vs. SFST: 34%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $176.08M vs. SFST: $433.13M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $176.08M. SFST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $433.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than SFST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFST’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than SFST.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.73% price change this week, while SFST (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

SFST is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFST($433M) has a higher market cap than CBFV($176M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than SFST: CBFV (67.58) vs SFST (16.37). SFST YTD gains are higher at: 33.057 vs. CBFV (26.040). CBFV has less debt than SFST: CBFV (34.7M) vs SFST (265M). SFST has higher revenues than CBFV: SFST (111M) vs CBFV (39.2M).
CBFVSFSTCBFV / SFST
Capitalization176M433M41%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.04033.05779%
P/E Ratio67.5816.37413%
Revenue39.2M111M35%
Total CashN/A13.9M-
Total Debt34.7M265M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs SFST: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
SFST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2574
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1668
SMR RATING
1..100
7948
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
285
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFST's Valuation (74) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (95). This means that SFST’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFST (68). This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFST’s over the last 12 months.

SFST's SMR Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (79). This means that SFST’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

SFST's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (47). This means that SFST’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFST (85). This means that CBFV’s stock grew significantly faster than SFST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVSFST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYFL46.50N/A
N/A
Century Financial Corp.
OKMN0.04N/A
N/A
OKMIN RESOURCES, INC.
KGBLY40.10N/A
N/A
Kingboard Laminates Holdings Ltd.
MTWTF12.31N/A
N/A
Metawater Co Ltd
PRYMF100.65N/A
N/A
Prysmian S.P.A.

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-0.09%
WNEB - CBFV
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
SFST - CBFV
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
FRAF - CBFV
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
HTB - CBFV
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
CCNE - CBFV
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
More

SFST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFST has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFST jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFST
1D Price
Change %
SFST100%
-0.02%
SHBI - SFST
74%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
ORRF - SFST
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
HTB - SFST
74%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
GABC - SFST
74%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
CCBG - SFST
73%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
More