CBFV
Price
$32.81
Change
-$0.34 (-1.03%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
163.58M
45 days until earnings call
PRK
Price
$172.09
Change
-$1.20 (-0.69%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
49 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs PRK

Header iconCBFV vs PRK Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs PRKBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$32.81
Change-$0.34 (-1.03%)
Volume$6.86K
Capitalization163.58M
Park National
Price$172.09
Change-$1.20 (-0.69%)
Volume$35.34K
Capitalization2.77B
CBFV vs PRK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. PRK commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Buy and PRK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $32.81 vs. PRK: $172.09)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and PRK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 48% vs. PRK: 55%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $163.58M vs. PRK: $2.77B
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $163.58M. PRK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePRK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PRK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than PRK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRK’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PRK’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRK is a better buy in the short-term than CBFV.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.44% price change this week, while PRK (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

PRK is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRK($2.77B) has a higher market cap than CBFV($164M). PRK has higher P/E ratio than CBFV: PRK (16.74) vs CBFV (15.33). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 17.683 vs. PRK (2.306). CBFV has less debt than PRK: CBFV (34.7M) vs PRK (303M).
CBFVPRKCBFV / PRK
Capitalization164M2.77B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.6832.306767%
P/E Ratio15.3316.7492%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A148M-
Total Debt34.7M303M11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs PRK: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
PRK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1328
SMR RATING
1..100
5917
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
771
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBFV's Valuation (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PRK (72) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to PRK’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PRK (28) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to PRK’s over the last 12 months.

PRK's SMR Rating (17) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PRK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PRK (50) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to PRK’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRK (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVPRK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BINIX32.470.28
+0.87%
Baron International Growth Institutional
RPMGX103.210.33
+0.32%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
DNLAX43.170.11
+0.26%
BNY Mellon Natural Resources A
DHPYX18.670.03
+0.16%
Diamond Hill Mid Cap Y
JORNX20.57-0.01
-0.05%
Janus Henderson Global Select T

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-1.03%
WNEB - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
MRBK - CBFV
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
USCB - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
PRK - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
CADE - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More

PRK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRK has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PRK jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRK
1D Price
Change %
PRK100%
-0.69%
STBA - PRK
88%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
PEBO - PRK
88%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
CTBI - PRK
88%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
FMBH - PRK
87%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
WSFS - PRK
87%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
More