CBFV
Price
$32.81
Change
-$0.34 (-1.03%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
163.58M
46 days until earnings call
LSBK
Price
$13.19
Change
-$0.06 (-0.45%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
103.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs LSBK

Header iconCBFV vs LSBK Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs LSBKBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$32.81
Change-$0.34 (-1.03%)
Volume$6.86K
Capitalization163.58M
Lake Shore Ban
Price$13.19
Change-$0.06 (-0.45%)
Volume$36.06K
Capitalization103.22M
CBFV vs LSBK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. LSBK commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Hold and LSBK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $32.81 vs. LSBK: $13.19)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and LSBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 48% vs. LSBK: 58%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $163.58M vs. LSBK: $103.22M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $163.58M. LSBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $103.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLSBK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LSBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than LSBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LSBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than LSBK.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.44% price change this week, while LSBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBFV($164M) has a higher market cap than LSBK($103M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than LSBK: CBFV (15.33) vs LSBK (12.56). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 17.683 vs. LSBK (-2.179). LSBK has less debt than CBFV: LSBK (2M) vs CBFV (34.7M).
CBFVLSBKCBFV / LSBK
Capitalization164M103M159%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.683-2.179-812%
P/E Ratio15.3312.56122%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A2.93M-
Total Debt34.7M2M1,735%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs LSBK: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
LSBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2417
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1353
SMR RATING
1..100
5977
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
783
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LSBK's Valuation (53) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LSBK’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSBK (53) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's SMR Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LSBK (77) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LSBK (61) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for LSBK (83) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew significantly faster than LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVLSBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WBTNF1.730.07
+4.23%
WEEBIT NANO LTD.
KRYAY91.961.40
+1.54%
Kerry Group plc
EUSP0.01N/A
N/A
Eurosite Power Inc.
KOJAF12.30N/A
N/A
Kojamo PLC
OAMCF0.26-0.02
-6.83%
Overactive Media Corp.

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-1.03%
WNEB - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
MRBK - CBFV
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
USCB - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
PRK - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
CADE - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More

LSBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSBK and CMA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSBK and CMA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSBK
1D Price
Change %
LSBK100%
-0.45%
CMA - LSBK
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.46%
AFBI - LSBK
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
CBFV - LSBK
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
CNOBP - LSBK
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
FRST - LSBK
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
More