CBFV
Price
$33.96
Change
+$0.07 (+0.21%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
169.31M
24 days until earnings call
LARK
Price
$26.99
Change
-$0.24 (-0.88%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
156.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs LARK

Header iconCBFV vs LARK Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs LARKBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$33.96
Change+$0.07 (+0.21%)
Volume$9.51K
Capitalization169.31M
Landmark Ban
Price$26.99
Change-$0.24 (-0.88%)
Volume$8.84K
Capitalization156.09M
CBFV vs LARK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. LARK commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Buy and LARK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $33.96 vs. LARK: $26.99)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and LARK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 54% vs. LARK: 119%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $169.31M vs. LARK: $156.09M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $169.31M. LARK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $156.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLARK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LARK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LARK is a better buy in the long-term than CBFV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LARK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LARK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LARK is a better buy in the short-term than CBFV.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while LARK (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBFV($169M) has a higher market cap than LARK($156M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than LARK: CBFV (15.87) vs LARK (9.60). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 21.808 vs. LARK (15.062). CBFV has less debt than LARK: CBFV (34.7M) vs LARK (177M). LARK has higher revenues than CBFV: LARK (65.4M) vs CBFV (49.3M).
CBFVLARKCBFV / LARK
Capitalization169M156M108%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.80815.062145%
P/E Ratio15.879.60165%
Revenue49.3M65.4M75%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt34.7M177M20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs LARK: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
LARK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
267
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1229
SMR RATING
1..100
5950
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
749
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LARK's Valuation (28) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (68) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (29) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's SMR Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (49) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LARK (49) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than LARK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVLARK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASAGF1.010.01
+1.00%
Australian Agricultural Co Ltd.
AASP5.20N/A
N/A
Agassi Sports Entertainment Corp.
TCKRF40.13N/A
N/A
Teck Resources Ltd.
KWPCF25.50N/A
N/A
Kewpie Corp
AMTY0.04N/A
-10.23%
Amerityre Corp.

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+0.21%
WNEB - CBFV
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
MRBK - CBFV
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
BVFL - CBFV
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
FUNC - CBFV
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
BFIN - CBFV
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More

LARK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LARK has been loosely correlated with UNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LARK jumps, then UNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LARK
1D Price
Change %
LARK100%
-0.86%
UNB - LARK
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
CBFV - LARK
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
UBFO - LARK
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
FUNC - LARK
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
FCCO - LARK
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
More