CBFV
Price
$32.56
Change
-$0.25 (-0.76%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
163.58M
45 days until earnings call
LARK
Price
$26.99
Change
+$0.12 (+0.45%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
155.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs LARK

Header iconCBFV vs LARK Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs LARKBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$32.56
Change-$0.25 (-0.76%)
Volume$100
Capitalization163.58M
Landmark Ban
Price$26.99
Change+$0.12 (+0.45%)
Volume$130
Capitalization155.4M
CBFV vs LARK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. LARK commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Buy and LARK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $32.81 vs. LARK: $26.87)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and LARK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 48% vs. LARK: 34%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $163.58M vs. LARK: $155.4M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $163.58M. LARK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $155.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLARK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LARK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LARK is a better buy in the long-term than CBFV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LARK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LARK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LARK is a better buy in the short-term than CBFV.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.44% price change this week, while LARK (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBFV($164M) has a higher market cap than LARK($155M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than LARK: CBFV (15.33) vs LARK (9.56). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 17.683 vs. LARK (14.551). CBFV has less debt than LARK: CBFV (34.7M) vs LARK (177M).
CBFVLARKCBFV / LARK
Capitalization164M155M106%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.68314.551122%
P/E Ratio15.339.56160%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt34.7M177M20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs LARK: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
LARK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1331
SMR RATING
1..100
5950
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
759
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LARK's Valuation (28) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (31) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's SMR Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LARK (59) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than LARK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVLARK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASAGF0.910.01
+1.07%
Australian Agricultural Co Ltd.
ASBFY30.470.20
+0.66%
Associated British Foods plc
DYFSF0.09N/A
N/A
Dynacert Inc
NWSGY9.68N/A
N/A
CTF Services Limited
GOLXF0.03N/A
-6.48%
GOLDEN LAKE EXPL INC.

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-1.03%
WNEB - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
MRBK - CBFV
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
USCB - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
PRK - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
CADE - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More

LARK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LARK has been loosely correlated with UBFO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LARK jumps, then UBFO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LARK
1D Price
Change %
LARK100%
-0.96%
UBFO - LARK
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
UNB - LARK
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
CBFV - LARK
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
FUNC - LARK
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
BVFL - LARK
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More