CBFV
Price
$31.63
Change
-$0.26 (-0.82%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
157.69M
66 days until earnings call
FSBH
Price
$9.53
Change
+$0.13 (+1.38%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
28.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs FSBH

Header iconCBFV vs FSBH Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs FSBHBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$31.63
Change-$0.26 (-0.82%)
Volume$5.77K
Capitalization157.69M
FSBH
Price$9.53
Change+$0.13 (+1.38%)
Volume$28K
Capitalization28.67M
CBFV vs FSBH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. FSBH commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Hold and FSBH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $31.63 vs. FSBH: $9.53)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and FSBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 19% vs. FSBH: 2198%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $157.69M vs. FSBH: $28.67M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $157.69M. FSBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $28.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFSBH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FSBH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than FSBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSBH’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSBH’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than FSBH.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.61% price change this week, while FSBH (@Regional Banks) price change was +14.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBFV($158M) has a higher market cap than FSBH($28.7M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than FSBH: CBFV (14.78) vs FSBH (12.38). FSBH YTD gains are higher at: 31.448 vs. CBFV (13.450).
CBFVFSBHCBFV / FSBH
Capitalization158M28.7M551%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.45031.44843%
P/E Ratio14.7812.38119%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt34.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVFSBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOTRF0.18N/A
N/A
China Everbright Water Ltd.
ITVPY11.01N/A
N/A
ITV Plc.
KONMY88.21N/A
N/A
Konami Group Corporation
KCRD0.03N/A
N/A
Kindcard Inc.
TGAAF9.12N/A
N/A
Target Global Acquisition I Corp.

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with EBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then EBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-0.00%
EBC - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
WAL - CBFV
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
BHLB - CBFV
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
TCBI - CBFV
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
SBCF - CBFV
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
More

FSBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBH has been loosely correlated with CMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSBH jumps, then CMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBH
1D Price
Change %
FSBH100%
+1.38%
CMGGF - FSBH
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TBBA - FSBH
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBAJF - FSBH
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBFV - FSBH
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.00%
ALBKY - FSBH
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.84%
More