CBFV
Price
$32.41
Change
-$0.08 (-0.25%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
111.19M
88 days until earnings call
CMA
Price
$67.99
Change
+$0.51 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.17B
82 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs CMA

Header iconCBFV vs CMA Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs CMABanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$32.41
Change-$0.08 (-0.25%)
Volume$31.22K
Capitalization111.19M
Comerica
Price$67.99
Change+$0.51 (+0.76%)
Volume$3.55M
Capitalization7.17B
CBFV vs CMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. CMA commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Buy and CMA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $32.41 vs. CMA: $67.99)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and CMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 107% vs. CMA: 181%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $111.19M vs. CMA: $7.17B
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $111.19M. CMA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than CMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than CMA.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а +17.60% price change this week, while CMA (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

CMA is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMA($7.17B) has a higher market cap than CBFV($111M). CMA has higher P/E ratio than CBFV: CMA (8.40) vs CBFV (4.89). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 15.300 vs. CMA (12.704). CBFV has less debt than CMA: CBFV (34.7M) vs CMA (9.77B). CMA has higher revenues than CBFV: CMA (3.59B) vs CBFV (42.4M).
CBFVCMACBFV / CMA
Capitalization111M7.17B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.30012.704120%
P/E Ratio4.898.4058%
Revenue42.4M3.59B1%
Total CashN/A1.44B-
Total Debt34.7M9.77B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs CMA: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
CMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4842
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1754
SMR RATING
1..100
529
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
540
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBFV's Valuation (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (83) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMA (54) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's SMR Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMA (40) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVCMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VESMX19.400.07
+0.36%
VELA Small Cap I
EURNZD1.95N/A
N/A
Euro - New Zealand Dollar
HKDNZD0.21N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - New Zealand Dollar
USDJPY147.00N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Japan Yen
CHFEUR1.07-0.00
-0.19%
Switzerland Franc - Euro

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-0.25%
WNEB - CBFV
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
CMA - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
CFFI - CBFV
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
VBTX - CBFV
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
UBFO - CBFV
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

CMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMA has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMA jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMA
1D Price
Change %
CMA100%
+0.76%
FNB - CMA
85%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
FHN - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
+2.66%
BKU - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
ABCB - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
FITB - CMA
82%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
More