CBFV
Price
$35.40
Change
+$0.49 (+1.40%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
177.39M
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CFFN
Price
$7.02
Change
+$0.05 (+0.72%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
907.93M
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs CFFN

Header iconCBFV vs CFFN Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs CFFNBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$35.40
Change+$0.49 (+1.40%)
Volume$21.35K
Capitalization177.39M
Capitol Federal Financial
Price$7.02
Change+$0.05 (+0.72%)
Volume$921.59K
Capitalization907.93M
CBFV vs CFFN Comparison Chart in %
CBFV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CFFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. CFFN commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Buy and CFFN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $35.40 vs. CFFN: $7.02)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and CFFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 318% vs. CFFN: 124%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $177.39M vs. CFFN: $907.93M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $177.39M. CFFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $907.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCFFN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CFFN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than CFFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFFN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CFFN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than CFFN.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while CFFN (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

CFFN is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFFN($908M) has a higher market cap than CBFV($177M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than CFFN: CBFV (68.08) vs CFFN (13.50). CBFV (26.973) and CFFN (25.721) have similar YTD gains . CBFV has less debt than CFFN: CBFV (34.7M) vs CFFN (2.07B). CFFN has higher revenues than CBFV: CFFN (189M) vs CBFV (49.3M).
CBFVCFFNCBFV / CFFN
Capitalization177M908M19%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.97325.721105%
P/E Ratio68.0813.50504%
Revenue49.3M189M26%
Total CashN/A24.4M-
Total Debt34.7M2.07B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs CFFN: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
CFFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2328
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15100
SMR RATING
1..100
5938
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
288
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFFN's Valuation (69) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (95) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFFN’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFFN (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew significantly faster than CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

CFFN's SMR Rating (38) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFFN’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CFFN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFFN’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFFN (88) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew significantly faster than CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVCFFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CFFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WSMGX23.060.28
+1.23%
Wilshire Small Company Growth Instl
CEIZX14.010.11
+0.79%
Manning & Napier Callodine Equity Inc Z
PLXGX23.170.16
+0.70%
Virtus KAR Capital Growth I
ACFCX73.010.04
+0.05%
American Century Focused Dynamic Gr R
TRGLX77.32-0.03
-0.04%
T. Rowe Price Global Stock I

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+1.40%
WNEB - CBFV
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
SFST - CBFV
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
CCNE - CBFV
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
CFFN - CBFV
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
GBCI - CBFV
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
More

CFFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFN has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFFN jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFFN
1D Price
Change %
CFFN100%
+0.72%
STBA - CFFN
84%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
SRCE - CFFN
82%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
NWBI - CFFN
82%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
TRMK - CFFN
82%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
UBSI - CFFN
82%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
More