CBDW vs PHPMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBDW is a Hold and PHPMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBDW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHPMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CBDW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PHPMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
CBDW (@Tobacco) experienced а -9.91% price change this week, while PHPMF (@Tobacco) price change was -7.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was -5.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.12%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Tobacco (-5.83% weekly)The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.
| CBDW | PHPMF | CBDW / PHPMF | |
| Capitalization | 959K | 1.87B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -63.158 | -7.339 | 861% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 12.07 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
CBDW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CBDW and PHPMF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBDW and PHPMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBDW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBDW | 100% | -4.55% | ||
| PHPMF - CBDW | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHUC - CBDW | 10% Poorly correlated | -6.13% | ||
| RLX - CBDW | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
| KAVL - CBDW | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.16% | ||
| PYYX - CBDW | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PHPMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PHPMF and SMORF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PHPMF and SMORF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHPMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHPMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SMORF - PHPMF | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CBDW - PHPMF | 11% Poorly correlated | -4.55% | ||
| RLX - PHPMF | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
| CHUC - PHPMF | 6% Poorly correlated | -6.13% | ||
| KAVL - PHPMF | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.16% | ||
More | ||||