CBDBY
Price
$0.56
Change
+$0.04 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
291.6M
MAKSF
Price
$4.92
Change
-$0.36 (-6.82%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
9.47B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBDBY vs MAKSF

Header iconCBDBY vs MAKSF Comparison
Open Charts CBDBY vs MAKSFBanner chart's image
Companhia Brasileira de Distribuicao
Price$0.56
Change+$0.04 (+7.69%)
Volume$3.12K
Capitalization291.6M
Marks & Spencer Group
Price$4.92
Change-$0.36 (-6.82%)
Volume$269
Capitalization9.47B
CBDBY vs MAKSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBDBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAKSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBDBY vs. MAKSF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBDBY is a Hold and MAKSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CBDBY: $0.56 vs. MAKSF: $4.92)
Brand notoriety: CBDBY and MAKSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBDBY: 15% vs. MAKSF: 5%
Market capitalization -- CBDBY: $291.6M vs. MAKSF: $9.47B
CBDBY [@Department Stores] is valued at $291.6M. MAKSF’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $9.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $5.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBDBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAKSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBDBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAKSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAKSF is a better buy in the long-term than CBDBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBDBY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAKSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBDBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MAKSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBDBY is a better buy in the short-term than MAKSF.

Price Growth

CBDBY (@Department Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MAKSF (@Department Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (+1.62% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAKSF($9.47B) has a higher market cap than CBDBY($292M). MAKSF has higher P/E ratio than CBDBY: MAKSF (25.55) vs CBDBY (2.37). CBDBY YTD gains are higher at: 72.573 vs. MAKSF (6.412). MAKSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.49B vs. CBDBY (1.27B). CBDBY has more cash in the bank: 2.3B vs. MAKSF (1.15B). MAKSF has less debt than CBDBY: MAKSF (2.94B) vs CBDBY (5.15B). CBDBY has higher revenues than MAKSF: CBDBY (19.9B) vs MAKSF (13.8B).
CBDBYMAKSFCBDBY / MAKSF
Capitalization292M9.47B3%
EBITDA1.27B1.49B85%
Gain YTD72.5736.4121,132%
P/E Ratio2.3725.559%
Revenue19.9B13.8B144%
Total Cash2.3B1.15B201%
Total Debt5.15B2.94B175%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBDBY vs MAKSF: Fundamental Ratings
CBDBY
MAKSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
9793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a22

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBDBY's Valuation (22) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as MAKSF (49) in the null industry. This means that CBDBY’s stock grew similarly to MAKSF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBDBY (100) in the Food Retail industry. This means that MAKSF’s stock grew significantly faster than CBDBY’s over the last 12 months.

MAKSF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CBDBY (97) in the Food Retail industry. This means that MAKSF’s stock grew similarly to CBDBY’s over the last 12 months.

CBDBY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as MAKSF (50) in the null industry. This means that CBDBY’s stock grew similarly to MAKSF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKSF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBDBY (100) in the Food Retail industry. This means that MAKSF’s stock grew significantly faster than CBDBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBDBYMAKSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBDBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAKSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGLSX51.070.66
+1.31%
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
JSGAX28.850.29
+1.02%
JHancock U.S. Growth A
WCFEX17.720.13
+0.74%
WCM Focused Emerging Mkts Ex Chn Inv
SCUIX30.310.20
+0.66%
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps I
TSMVX28.590.10
+0.35%
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value I2

CBDBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBDBY and KSS have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBDBY and KSS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBDBY
1D Price
Change %
CBDBY100%
N/A
KSS - CBDBY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
M - CBDBY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AONNY - CBDBY
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
ELPQF - CBDBY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DDS - CBDBY
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
More

MAKSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAKSF and KSS have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAKSF and KSS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAKSF
1D Price
Change %
MAKSF100%
N/A
KSS - MAKSF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
M - MAKSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AONNY - MAKSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
CBDBY - MAKSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HDVTY - MAKSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More