CBDBY
Price
$0.56
Change
+$0.04 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
284.47M
DDS
Price
$455.81
Change
+$5.38 (+1.19%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.13B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBDBY vs DDS

Header iconCBDBY vs DDS Comparison
Open Charts CBDBY vs DDSBanner chart's image
Companhia Brasileira de Distribuicao
Price$0.56
Change+$0.04 (+7.69%)
Volume$3.12K
Capitalization284.47M
Dillards
Price$455.81
Change+$5.38 (+1.19%)
Volume$60.12K
Capitalization7.13B
CBDBY vs DDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBDBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBDBY vs. DDS commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBDBY is a Hold and DDS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CBDBY: $0.56 vs. DDS: $455.81)
Brand notoriety: CBDBY and DDS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBDBY: 15% vs. DDS: 46%
Market capitalization -- CBDBY: $284.47M vs. DDS: $7.13B
CBDBY [@Department Stores] is valued at $284.47M. DDS’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $7.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $5.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBDBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDDS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CBDBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DDS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, DDS is a better buy in the long-term than CBDBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBDBY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DDS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBDBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CBDBY and DDS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CBDBY (@Department Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DDS (@Department Stores) price change was +10.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

DDS is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (+1.62% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DDS($7.13B) has a higher market cap than CBDBY($284M). DDS has higher P/E ratio than CBDBY: DDS (12.62) vs CBDBY (2.37). CBDBY YTD gains are higher at: 72.573 vs. DDS (5.712). DDS has less debt than CBDBY: DDS (555M) vs CBDBY (5.15B).
CBDBYDDSCBDBY / DDS
Capitalization284M7.13B4%
EBITDA1.27BN/A-
Gain YTD72.5735.7121,270%
P/E Ratio2.3712.6219%
Revenue19.9BN/A-
Total Cash2.3BN/A-
Total Debt5.15B555M927%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBDBY vs DDS: Fundamental Ratings
CBDBY
DDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10018
SMR RATING
1..100
9732
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10026
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a42

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBDBY's Valuation (22) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as DDS (38) in the Department Stores industry. This means that CBDBY’s stock grew similarly to DDS’s over the last 12 months.

DDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Department Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBDBY (100) in the Food Retail industry. This means that DDS’s stock grew significantly faster than CBDBY’s over the last 12 months.

DDS's SMR Rating (32) in the Department Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBDBY (97) in the Food Retail industry. This means that DDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBDBY’s over the last 12 months.

DDS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Department Stores industry is in the same range as CBDBY (44) in the Food Retail industry. This means that DDS’s stock grew similarly to CBDBY’s over the last 12 months.

DDS's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Department Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBDBY (100) in the Food Retail industry. This means that DDS’s stock grew significantly faster than CBDBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBDBYDDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBDBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GALLX21.200.19
+0.90%
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity A
HLMOX8.630.04
+0.47%
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inv
USDCHF0.79N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Switzerland Franc
EURCNY8.43N/A
N/A
Euro - China Yuan
HKDCNY0.91N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - China Yuan

CBDBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBDBY and KSS have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBDBY and KSS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBDBY
1D Price
Change %
CBDBY100%
N/A
KSS - CBDBY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
M - CBDBY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AONNY - CBDBY
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
ELPQF - CBDBY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DDS - CBDBY
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
More

DDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDS has been loosely correlated with KSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDS jumps, then KSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDS
1D Price
Change %
DDS100%
+1.19%
KSS - DDS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
M - DDS
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AONNY - DDS
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
DDT - DDS
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HDVTY - DDS
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More