Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBBZX vs RMFCX
CBBZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBBZX vs RMFCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
CBBZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBBZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBZX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CBBZX (1.84B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBBZX: RMFCX (1.24) vs CBBZX (1.15). CBBZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBBZX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBBZX (0.63). CBBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBBZX: RMFCX (250) vs CBBZX (2000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.71 vs. CBBZX (-1.57). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.72 vs. CBBZX (42.61).
| CBBZX | RMFCX | CBBZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.593 | 11.292 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.24 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.57 | 8.71 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.91 | 28.01 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.61 | 56.72 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.92 | 92.34 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers