Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBBZX vs RMFCX
CBBZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBBZX vs RMFCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
CBBZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBBZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBZX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CBBZX (1.86B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBBZX: RMFCX (1.24) vs CBBZX (1.06). CBBZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBBZX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBBZX (0.63). CBBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBBZX: RMFCX (250) vs CBBZX (2000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. CBBZX (6.43). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. CBBZX (23.06).
| CBBZX | RMFCX | CBBZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.128 | 2.244 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.24 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.43 | 7.45 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.80 | 28.73 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.06 | 44.16 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.12 | 105.79 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement