Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBBZX vs RMFCX
CBBZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBBZX vs RMFCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
CBBZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBBZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CBBZX (1.81B). RMFCX (1.18) and CBBZX (1.12) have matching dividends . CBBZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBBZX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBBZX (0.63). CBBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBBZX: RMFCX (250) vs CBBZX (2000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. CBBZX (-5.55). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.02 vs. CBBZX (27.45).
| CBBZX | RMFCX | CBBZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.047 | 15.500 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.18 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.55 | 6.27 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.35 | 27.68 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.45 | 52.02 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.00 | 90.44 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers