CBBLF
Price
$0.02
Change
+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.01M
PGXPF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBBLF vs PGXPF

Header iconCBBLF vs PGXPF Comparison
Open Charts CBBLF vs PGXPFBanner chart's image
CBLT
Price$0.02
Change+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization2.01M
Pelangio Exploration
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$75.53K
Capitalization2.89M
CBBLF vs PGXPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBBLF vs. PGXPF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBLF is a Hold and PGXPF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CBBLF: $0.02 vs. PGXPF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: CBBLF and PGXPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBBLF: 204% vs. PGXPF: 127%
Market capitalization -- CBBLF: $2.01M vs. PGXPF: $2.89M
CBBLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.01M. PGXPF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBBLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePGXPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBBLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PGXPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBBLF is a better buy in the long-term than PGXPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBBLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGXPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBBLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PGXPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGXPF is a better buy in the short-term than CBBLF.

Price Growth

CBBLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PGXPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +10.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGXPF($2.89M) has a higher market cap than CBBLF($2.01M). PGXPF YTD gains are higher at: 362.408 vs. CBBLF (100.000). CBBLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -428.02K vs. PGXPF (-1.61M). CBBLF has more cash in the bank: 1.35M vs. PGXPF (703K). PGXPF has less debt than CBBLF: PGXPF (40K) vs CBBLF (107K). CBBLF has higher revenues than PGXPF: CBBLF (0) vs PGXPF (-400K).
CBBLFPGXPFCBBLF / PGXPF
Capitalization2.01M2.89M70%
EBITDA-428.02K-1.61M27%
Gain YTD100.000362.40828%
P/E Ratio7.81N/A-
Revenue0-400K-
Total Cash1.35M703K191%
Total Debt107K40K268%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBBLF vs PGXPF: Fundamental Ratings
CBBLF
PGXPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5025
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBBLF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as PGXPF (89). This means that CBBLF’s stock grew similarly to PGXPF’s over the last 12 months.

CBBLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as PGXPF (100). This means that CBBLF’s stock grew similarly to PGXPF’s over the last 12 months.

CBBLF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as PGXPF (100). This means that CBBLF’s stock grew similarly to PGXPF’s over the last 12 months.

PGXPF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBLF (35). This means that PGXPF’s stock grew similarly to CBBLF’s over the last 12 months.

CBBLF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PGXPF (100). This means that CBBLF’s stock grew significantly faster than PGXPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBBLFPGXPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGEN8.500.15
+1.80%
Tecogen Inc
BMI193.013.19
+1.68%
Badger Meter
AMX18.480.14
+0.76%
America Movil SAB de CV
BLX41.74-0.44
-1.04%
Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior SA
PRQR2.23-0.03
-1.33%
ProQR Therapeutics NV

CBBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBBLF and METOF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBBLF and METOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBBLF
1D Price
Change %
CBBLF100%
N/A
METOF - CBBLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.95%
PGXPF - CBBLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKE - CBBLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.86%
DCNNF - CBBLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.00%
CAMZF - CBBLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PGXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGXPF and CBBLF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGXPF and CBBLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGXPF
1D Price
Change %
PGXPF100%
N/A
CBBLF - PGXPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWCBF - PGXPF
29%
Poorly correlated
+44.22%
HANCF - PGXPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCNNF - PGXPF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.00%
LITM - PGXPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.39%
More