CBBHF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
15.15M
ILKAY
Price
$21.47
Change
+$0.35 (+1.66%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBBHF vs ILKAY

Header iconCBBHF vs ILKAY Comparison
Open Charts CBBHF vs ILKAYBanner chart's image
Cobalt Blue
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.6K
Capitalization15.15M
Iluka Resources
Price$21.47
Change+$0.35 (+1.66%)
Volume$4.36K
Capitalization1.78B
CBBHF vs ILKAY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ILKAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBBHF vs. ILKAY commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBHF is a Buy and ILKAY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CBBHF: $0.04 vs. ILKAY: $21.47)
Brand notoriety: CBBHF and ILKAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBBHF: 166% vs. ILKAY: 132%
Market capitalization -- CBBHF: $15.15M vs. ILKAY: $1.78B
CBBHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.15M. ILKAY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBBHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileILKAY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBBHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ILKAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ILKAY is a better buy in the long-term than CBBHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBBHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ILKAY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBBHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ILKAY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ILKAY is a better buy in the short-term than CBBHF.

Price Growth

CBBHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +26.52% price change this week, while ILKAY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.88% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILKAY($1.78B) has a higher market cap than CBBHF($15.2M). ILKAY YTD gains are higher at: 37.227 vs. CBBHF (-23.502).
CBBHFILKAYCBBHF / ILKAY
Capitalization15.2M1.78B1%
EBITDA-37.97MN/A-
Gain YTD-23.50237.227-63%
P/E RatioN/A12.23-
Revenue1.93MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBBHF vs ILKAY: Fundamental Ratings
CBBHF
ILKAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
686
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
9867
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5137
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ILKAY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBHF (41). This means that ILKAY’s stock grew similarly to CBBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ILKAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBHF (100). This means that ILKAY’s stock grew similarly to CBBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ILKAY's SMR Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBHF (98). This means that ILKAY’s stock grew similarly to CBBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ILKAY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBHF (51). This means that ILKAY’s stock grew similarly to CBBHF’s over the last 12 months.

ILKAY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBBHF (100). This means that ILKAY’s stock grew significantly faster than CBBHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBBHFILKAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ILKAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTBRF1.690.12
+7.81%
Restaurant Brands NZ Ltd.
TMXXF41.310.25
+0.60%
TMX Group Ltd.
PDRX2.75N/A
N/A
PD-RX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
IRRHF2389.97N/A
N/A
Interroll Holdings SA
ALVLF0.10N/A
-1.10%
Big Ridge Gold Corp.

CBBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBBHF and POROF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBBHF and POROF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBBHF
1D Price
Change %
CBBHF100%
+0.24%
POROF - CBBHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.43%
ATCMF - CBBHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.19%
ILKAY - CBBHF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
AAGFF - CBBHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
CHXMF - CBBHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
More

ILKAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ILKAY and CBBHF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILKAY and CBBHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILKAY
1D Price
Change %
ILKAY100%
+1.67%
CBBHF - ILKAY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
VALE - ILKAY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
ILKAF - ILKAY
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
HUSIF - ILKAY
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
HRFEF - ILKAY
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More