Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBBCX vs RMFEX
CBBCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CBBCX vs RMFEX
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.89
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
CBBCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBBCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CBBCX (1.82B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CBBCX: RMFEX (1.46) vs CBBCX (0.14). CBBCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CBBCX (32 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). CBBCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). CBBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBBCX: RMFEX (250) vs CBBCX (2500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. CBBCX (-6.88). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. CBBCX (33.21).
| CBBCX | RMFEX | CBBCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.62 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.080 | 13.941 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.46 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.88 | 5.28 | -130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.30 | 40.09 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.21 | 59.52 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.40 | 98.84 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement