Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBBCX vs RMFEX
CBBCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CBBCX vs RMFEX
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.90
Change+$0.30 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
CBBCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBBCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CBBCX (1.81B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CBBCX: RMFEX (1.43) vs CBBCX (0.14). CBBCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CBBCX (33 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). CBBCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). CBBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBBCX: RMFEX (250) vs CBBCX (2500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. CBBCX (-6.71). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.35 vs. CBBCX (20.35).
| CBBCX | RMFEX | CBBCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.62 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.960 | 15.801 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.43 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.71 | 6.59 | -102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.68 | 28.84 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.35 | 54.35 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.15 | 98.05 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement