Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBBCX vs RMFCX
CBBCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBBCX vs RMFCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
CBBCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBBCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBCX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CBBCX (1.84B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBBCX: RMFCX (1.24) vs CBBCX (0.14). CBBCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBBCX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBBCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CBBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBBCX: RMFCX (250) vs CBBCX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.71 vs. CBBCX (-2.80). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.72 vs. CBBCX (34.67).
| CBBCX | RMFCX | CBBCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.91 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.760 | 11.292 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.24 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.80 | 8.71 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.02 | 28.01 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.67 | 56.72 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.74 | 92.34 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement