CBAT
Price
$0.99
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
88.87M
Earnings call today
HAYW
Price
$15.89
Change
-$0.31 (-1.91%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.44B
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBAT vs HAYW

Header iconCBAT vs HAYW Comparison
Open Charts CBAT vs HAYWBanner chart's image
CBAK Energy Technology
Price$0.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$104.42K
Capitalization88.87M
Hayward Holdings
Price$15.89
Change-$0.31 (-1.91%)
Volume$1.6M
Capitalization3.44B
CBAT vs HAYW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAYW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBAT vs. HAYW commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBAT is a Hold and HAYW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CBAT: $0.99 vs. HAYW: $15.89)
Brand notoriety: CBAT and HAYW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBAT: 48% vs. HAYW: 71%
Market capitalization -- CBAT: $88.87M vs. HAYW: $3.44B
CBAT [@Electrical Products] is valued at $88.87M. HAYW’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $3.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $181.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $9.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBAT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHAYW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HAYW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAYW is a better buy in the long-term than CBAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAYW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HAYW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAYW is a better buy in the short-term than CBAT.

Price Growth

CBAT (@Electrical Products) experienced а +1.87% price change this week, while HAYW (@Electrical Products) price change was +4.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

HAYW is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (+2.89% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAYW($3.44B) has a higher market cap than CBAT($88.9M). HAYW has higher P/E ratio than CBAT: HAYW (26.48) vs CBAT (6.19). CBAT YTD gains are higher at: 5.117 vs. HAYW (3.924). HAYW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 282M vs. CBAT (5.61M). HAYW has more cash in the bank: 365M vs. CBAT (9.58M). CBAT has less debt than HAYW: CBAT (37.3M) vs HAYW (972M). HAYW has higher revenues than CBAT: HAYW (1.08B) vs CBAT (153M).
CBATHAYWCBAT / HAYW
Capitalization88.9M3.44B3%
EBITDA5.61M282M2%
Gain YTD5.1173.924130%
P/E Ratio6.1926.4823%
Revenue153M1.08B14%
Total Cash9.58M365M3%
Total Debt37.3M972M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBAT: Fundamental Ratings
CBAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBATHAYW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAYW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GENIX13.82N/A
N/A
Gotham Enhanced Return Institutional
MTOIX22.25-0.01
-0.04%
NYLI Income Builder Class I
ALAFX100.84-0.05
-0.05%
Alger Focus Equity A
VWIAX63.10-0.06
-0.09%
Vanguard Wellesley® Income Admiral™
RSIYX17.18-0.05
-0.29%
Victory RS Investors Y

CBAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBAT and ESP have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBAT and ESP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBAT
1D Price
Change %
CBAT100%
+0.04%
ESP - CBAT
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.86%
FCEL - CBAT
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
LTBR - CBAT
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
HAYW - CBAT
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
SLDP - CBAT
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.77%
More

HAYW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAYW has been loosely correlated with AEIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAYW jumps, then AEIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAYW
1D Price
Change %
HAYW100%
-1.91%
AEIS - HAYW
56%
Loosely correlated
-6.48%
ENS - HAYW
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
AYI - HAYW
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
KE - HAYW
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.49%
NVT - HAYW
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
More