CBAT
Price
$0.90
Change
-$0.01 (-1.10%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
80.12M
41 days until earnings call
HAYW
Price
$14.85
Change
+$0.31 (+2.13%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.22B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBAT vs HAYW

Header iconCBAT vs HAYW Comparison
Open Charts CBAT vs HAYWBanner chart's image
CBAK Energy Technology
Price$0.90
Change-$0.01 (-1.10%)
Volume$159.61K
Capitalization80.12M
Hayward Holdings
Price$14.85
Change+$0.31 (+2.13%)
Volume$1.77M
Capitalization3.22B
CBAT vs HAYW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAYW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBAT vs. HAYW commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBAT is a Buy and HAYW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CBAT: $0.90 vs. HAYW: $14.85)
Brand notoriety: CBAT and HAYW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBAT: 90% vs. HAYW: 64%
Market capitalization -- CBAT: $80.12M vs. HAYW: $3.22B
CBAT [@Electrical Products] is valued at $80.12M. HAYW’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $3.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $245.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $9.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBAT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHAYW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HAYW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBAT is a better buy in the long-term than HAYW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAYW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HAYW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBAT is a better buy in the short-term than HAYW.

Price Growth

CBAT (@Electrical Products) experienced а +4.73% price change this week, while HAYW (@Electrical Products) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

HAYW is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (+0.59% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAYW($3.22B) has a higher market cap than CBAT($80.1M). HAYW has higher P/E ratio than CBAT: HAYW (24.75) vs CBAT (6.19). HAYW YTD gains are higher at: -2.878 vs. CBAT (-3.851). HAYW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 282M vs. CBAT (5.61M). HAYW has more cash in the bank: 365M vs. CBAT (9.58M). CBAT has less debt than HAYW: CBAT (37.3M) vs HAYW (972M). HAYW has higher revenues than CBAT: HAYW (1.08B) vs CBAT (153M).
CBATHAYWCBAT / HAYW
Capitalization80.1M3.22B2%
EBITDA5.61M282M2%
Gain YTD-3.851-2.878134%
P/E Ratio6.1924.7525%
Revenue153M1.08B14%
Total Cash9.58M365M3%
Total Debt37.3M972M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBAT: Fundamental Ratings
CBAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBATHAYW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAYW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSPCX16.580.23
+1.41%
Emerald Growth C
DVLCX23.660.22
+0.94%
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value C
SBHCX12.710.11
+0.87%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Cre Ret
MGGLX36.85N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp L
ANFCX59.12-0.08
-0.14%
American Funds New Economy C

CBAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBAT and ESP have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBAT and ESP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBAT
1D Price
Change %
CBAT100%
-0.31%
ESP - CBAT
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
FCEL - CBAT
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
ENVX - CBAT
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
LTBR - CBAT
22%
Poorly correlated
+10.29%
HAYW - CBAT
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
More

HAYW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAYW has been loosely correlated with AEIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAYW jumps, then AEIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAYW
1D Price
Change %
HAYW100%
+2.13%
AEIS - HAYW
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
ENS - HAYW
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
AYI - HAYW
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
HUBB - HAYW
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
NVT - HAYW
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
More