It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBAOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRNO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBAOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRNO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CBAOF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRNO (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was -0.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.62%.
TRNO is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
CBAOF | TRNO | CBAOF / TRNO | |
Capitalization | 1.39B | 5.56B | 25% |
EBITDA | 3.73B | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 7.182 | -7.577 | -95% |
P/E Ratio | 11.29 | 21.25 | 53% |
Revenue | 4.77B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 323M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 19.2B | 742M | 2,588% |
CBAOF | TRNO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TRNO's Valuation (22) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CBAOF (35) in the null industry. This means that TRNO’s stock grew similarly to CBAOF’s over the last 12 months.
CBAOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as TRNO (82) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CBAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRNO’s over the last 12 months.
CBAOF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as TRNO (84) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CBAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRNO’s over the last 12 months.
CBAOF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as TRNO (78) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CBAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRNO’s over the last 12 months.
CBAOF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRNO (93) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CBAOF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRNO’s over the last 12 months.
CBAOF | TRNO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago52% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago52% | 4 days ago52% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 4 days ago49% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago52% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago65% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBAOF has been loosely correlated with FCXXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBAOF jumps, then FCXXF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBAOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CBAOF | 100% | N/A | ||
FCXXF - CBAOF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
TRNO - CBAOF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
AIV - CBAOF | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.60% | ||
SILA - CBAOF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
JRHIF - CBAOF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRNO has been closely correlated with PLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRNO jumps, then PLD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRNO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TRNO | 100% | -1.59% | ||
PLD - TRNO | 87% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
FR - TRNO | 86% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
EGP - TRNO | 85% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
STAG - TRNO | 82% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
REXR - TRNO | 82% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More |