CBAOF
Price
$1.95
Change
+$0.26 (+15.38%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.58B
CUZ
Price
$26.88
Change
+$0.10 (+0.37%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.52B
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CBAOF vs CUZ

Header iconCBAOF vs CUZ Comparison
Open Charts CBAOF vs CUZBanner chart's image
CIBanco SA CTF Bursatiles Fiduciarios Inmobiliario
Price$1.95
Change+$0.26 (+15.38%)
Volume$5.38K
Capitalization1.58B
Cousins Properties
Price$26.88
Change+$0.10 (+0.37%)
Volume$1.45M
Capitalization3.52B
CBAOF vs CUZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
CUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBAOF vs. CUZ commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBAOF is a Hold and CUZ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CBAOF: $1.95 vs. CUZ: $26.88)
Brand notoriety: CBAOF and CUZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBAOF: 132% vs. CUZ: 94%
Market capitalization -- CBAOF: $1.58B vs. CUZ: $3.52B
CBAOF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.58B. CUZ’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBAOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCUZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBAOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CUZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBAOF is a better buy in the long-term than CUZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CUZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CBAOF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +15.52% price change this week, while CUZ (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +3.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +3.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

CUZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+3.82% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUZ($3.52B) has a higher market cap than CBAOF($1.58B). CUZ has higher P/E ratio than CBAOF: CUZ (42.09) vs CBAOF (7.18). CBAOF YTD gains are higher at: 7.735 vs. CUZ (-10.383). CBAOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.26B vs. CUZ (504M). CBAOF has more cash in the bank: 473M vs. CUZ (6.05M). CUZ has less debt than CBAOF: CUZ (2.51B) vs CBAOF (15.7B). CBAOF has higher revenues than CUZ: CBAOF (3.92B) vs CUZ (803M).
CBAOFCUZCBAOF / CUZ
Capitalization1.58B3.52B45%
EBITDA4.26B504M846%
Gain YTD7.735-10.383-74%
P/E Ratio7.1842.0917%
Revenue3.92B803M488%
Total Cash473M6.05M7,822%
Total Debt15.7B2.51B625%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBAOF vs CUZ: Fundamental Ratings
CBAOF
CUZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5366
SMR RATING
1..100
7289
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
126
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBAOF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as CUZ (72) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CBAOF’s stock grew similarly to CUZ’s over the last 12 months.

CBAOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CUZ (66) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CBAOF’s stock grew similarly to CUZ’s over the last 12 months.

CBAOF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CUZ (89) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CBAOF’s stock grew similarly to CUZ’s over the last 12 months.

CBAOF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CUZ (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CBAOF’s stock grew similarly to CUZ’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CBAOF (12) in the null industry. This means that CUZ’s stock grew similarly to CBAOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

CBAOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBAOF has been loosely correlated with FCXXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBAOF jumps, then FCXXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBAOF
1D Price
Change %
CBAOF100%
N/A
FCXXF - CBAOF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CDP - CBAOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
BXP - CBAOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
TRNO - CBAOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
CUZ - CBAOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More

CUZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUZ has been closely correlated with HIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CUZ jumps, then HIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUZ
1D Price
Change %
CUZ100%
+0.37%
HIW - CUZ
86%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
BDN - CUZ
86%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
SLG - CUZ
80%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
BXP - CUZ
80%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
DEI - CUZ
78%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
More