It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEBMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBAN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EBMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CBAN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.00% price change this week, while EBMT (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.
CBAN is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.
EBMT is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
CBAN | EBMT | CBAN / EBMT | |
Capitalization | 202M | 102M | 198% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 33.102 | 10.183 | 325% |
P/E Ratio | 9.02 | 9.90 | 91% |
Revenue | 114M | 83.3M | 137% |
Total Cash | 23M | 19.7M | 117% |
Total Debt | 238M | 235M | 101% |
CBAN | EBMT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EBMT's Valuation (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBAN (49). This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to CBAN’s over the last 12 months.
CBAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (86). This means that CBAN’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.
CBAN's SMR Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (50). This means that CBAN’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.
CBAN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (42). This means that CBAN’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.
EBMT's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBAN (20). This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to CBAN’s over the last 12 months.
CBAN | EBMT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago62% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago48% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago53% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago39% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago48% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago60% | 4 days ago53% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago45% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago54% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago58% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBAN has been closely correlated with BFST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBAN jumps, then BFST could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CBAN | 100% | -0.98% | ||
BFST - CBAN | 77% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
AUB - CBAN | 77% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
SHBI - CBAN | 76% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
UVSP - CBAN | 76% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
FMBH - CBAN | 76% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBMT has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBMT jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EBMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EBMT | 100% | -0.59% | ||
SHBI - EBMT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
UBSI - EBMT | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
CBAN - EBMT | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
FNLC - EBMT | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
FHB - EBMT | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
More |