CAZGF
Price
$1.84
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
ST
Price
$32.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
80 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CAZGF vs ST

Header iconCAZGF vs ST Comparison
Open Charts CAZGF vs STBanner chart's image
Catapult Group International
Price$1.84
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Sensata Technologies Holding
Price$32.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.51M
CapitalizationN/A
CAZGF vs ST Comparison Chart
Loading...
ST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAZGF vs. ST commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAZGF is a Hold and ST is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (CAZGF: $1.85 vs. ST: $32.62)
Brand notoriety: CAZGF and ST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAZGF: 6% vs. ST: 121%
Market capitalization -- CAZGF: $200.02M vs. ST: $5.49B
CAZGF [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $200.02M. ST’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $5.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $109.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $5.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAZGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAZGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAZGF is a better buy in the long-term than ST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CAZGF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -7.28% price change this week, while ST (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -5.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

ST is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-5.22% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ST($5.49B) has a higher market cap than CAZGF($200M). CAZGF YTD gains are higher at: 117.059 vs. ST (-11.999). ST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 507M vs. CAZGF (-9.98M). ST has more cash in the bank: 508M vs. CAZGF (16.2M). CAZGF has less debt than ST: CAZGF (22.1M) vs ST (3.41B). ST has higher revenues than CAZGF: ST (4.05B) vs CAZGF (84.4M).
CAZGFSTCAZGF / ST
Capitalization200M5.49B4%
EBITDA-9.98M507M-2%
Gain YTD117.059-11.999-976%
P/E RatioN/A17.79-
Revenue84.4M4.05B2%
Total Cash16.2M508M3%
Total Debt22.1M3.41B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAZGF vs ST: Fundamental Ratings
CAZGF
ST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8957
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48100
SMR RATING
1..100
9690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3863
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAZGF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as ST (90) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CAZGF’s stock grew similarly to ST’s over the last 12 months.

CAZGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ST (100) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CAZGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ST’s over the last 12 months.

ST's SMR Rating (90) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as CAZGF (96) in the null industry. This means that ST’s stock grew similarly to CAZGF’s over the last 12 months.

CAZGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ST (63) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that CAZGF’s stock grew similarly to ST’s over the last 12 months.

ST's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAZGF (100) in the null industry. This means that ST’s stock grew significantly faster than CAZGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CAZGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAZGF and JELLF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAZGF and JELLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAZGF
1D Price
Change %
CAZGF100%
+23.00%
JELLF - CAZGF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNSS - CAZGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
ACFN - CAZGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-7.93%
ST - CAZGF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
FTV - CAZGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
More

ST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ST has been loosely correlated with CGNX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ST jumps, then CGNX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ST
1D Price
Change %
ST100%
-0.15%
CGNX - ST
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
MKSI - ST
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
FTV - ST
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
ESE - ST
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
VNT - ST
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
More