Advertisement
CAZGF vs CODAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAZGF is a Buy and CODAF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAZGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCODAF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CAZGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CODAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAZGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CODAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAZGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
- CODAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CAZGF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CODAF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.81%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-2.34% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| CAZGF | CODAF | CAZGF / CODAF | |
| Capitalization | 1.16B | 3.93B | 29% |
| EBITDA | 17.6M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 109.302 | 225.137 | 49% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 63.93 | - |
| Revenue | 117M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 10.8M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 9.8M | N/A | - |
CAZGF | CODAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 5 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CODAF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAZGF (65). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAZGF’s over the last 12 months.
CAZGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CODAF (24). This means that CAZGF’s stock grew similarly to CODAF’s over the last 12 months.
CODAF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAZGF (93). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAZGF’s over the last 12 months.
CODAF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CAZGF (38). This means that CODAF’s stock grew similarly to CAZGF’s over the last 12 months.
CODAF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAZGF (100). This means that CODAF’s stock grew significantly faster than CAZGF’s over the last 12 months.
| CAZGF | CODAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 25% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 13% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 31% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 17% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 22% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 22% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 4% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RINYX | 51.75 | -0.44 | -0.84% |
| Russell Inv International Devd Mkts Y | |||
| VEIPX | 47.15 | -0.42 | -0.88% |
| Vanguard Equity-Income Inv | |||
| JABZX | 10.43 | -0.17 | -1.60% |
| JHancock Global Environmental Opps A | |||
| BOPCX | 16.30 | -0.30 | -1.81% |
| Sterling Capital Special Opps C | |||
| TRBIX | 25.84 | -0.73 | -2.75% |
| Nuveen Small Cap Blend Idx Retire | |||
CAZGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CAZGF and FTV have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAZGF and FTV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAZGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAZGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FTV - CAZGF | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| WATT - CAZGF | 10% Poorly correlated | -6.29% | ||
| HXGBF - CAZGF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GNSS - CAZGF | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.62% | ||
| JELLF - CAZGF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CODAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CODAF and HXGBY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CODAF and HXGBY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CODAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CODAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HXGBY - CODAF | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
| KYCCF - CODAF | 0% Poorly correlated | -2.32% | ||
| JELLF - CODAF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HRIBF - CODAF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CAZGF - CODAF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||