CAXPF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.36M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLI
Price
$4.83
Change
-$0.11 (-2.23%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAXPF vs SLI

Header iconCAXPF vs SLI Comparison
Open Charts CAXPF vs SLIBanner chart's image
District Copper
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$57.8K
Capitalization1.36M
Standard Lithium
Price$4.83
Change-$0.11 (-2.23%)
Volume$1.09M
Capitalization1.16B
CAXPF vs SLI Comparison Chart in %
CAXPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAXPF vs. SLI commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAXPF is a Hold and SLI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CAXPF: $0.04 vs. SLI: $4.83)
Brand notoriety: CAXPF and SLI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAXPF: 180% vs. SLI: 26%
Market capitalization -- CAXPF: $1.36M vs. SLI: $1.16B
CAXPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.36M. SLI’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAXPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAXPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLI is a better buy in the long-term than CAXPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAXPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAXPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SLI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAXPF is a better buy in the short-term than SLI.

Price Growth

CAXPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.44% price change this week, while SLI (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +8.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLI is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+8.44% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLI($1.16B) has a higher market cap than CAXPF($1.36M). SLI YTD gains are higher at: 230.822 vs. CAXPF (95.122). SLI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 137M vs. CAXPF (-585.73K). SLI has more cash in the bank: 32.1M vs. CAXPF (238K). CAXPF (0) and SLI (0) have equivalent revenues.
CAXPFSLICAXPF / SLI
Capitalization1.36M1.16B0%
EBITDA-585.73K137M-0%
Gain YTD95.122230.82241%
P/E RatioN/A7.94-
Revenue00-
Total Cash238K32.1M1%
Total DebtN/A419K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAXPF vs SLI: Fundamental Ratings
CAXPF
SLI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9087
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
9817
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
995
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLI's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CAXPF (80). This means that SLI’s stock grew similarly to CAXPF’s over the last 12 months.

SLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CAXPF (100). This means that SLI’s stock grew similarly to CAXPF’s over the last 12 months.

SLI's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAXPF (98). This means that SLI’s stock grew significantly faster than CAXPF’s over the last 12 months.

SLI's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CAXPF (59). This means that SLI’s stock grew similarly to CAXPF’s over the last 12 months.

SLI's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAXPF (99). This means that SLI’s stock grew significantly faster than CAXPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAXPFSLI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAXPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STKL3.780.12
+3.28%
SunOpta
DQ31.420.12
+0.38%
Daqo New Energy Corp
CCK102.69-0.38
-0.37%
Crown Holdings
FGBIP15.20-0.22
-1.43%
First Guaranty Bancshares
XBP6.30-0.17
-2.63%
XBP Global Holdings Inc.

CAXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAXPF and MLGCF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAXPF and MLGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAXPF
1D Price
Change %
CAXPF100%
N/A
MLGCF - CAXPF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAOFF - CAXPF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVWFF - CAXPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.32%
SLROF - CAXPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLI - CAXPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
More

SLI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLI has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLI jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLI
1D Price
Change %
SLI100%
-2.23%
LAC - SLI
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
SGML - SLI
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
LAR - SLI
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
VZLA - SLI
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
MP - SLI
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
More