CAWW
Price
$0.89
Change
+$0.01 (+1.14%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
18.79M
DQWS
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
20.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAWW vs DQWS

Header iconCAWW vs DQWS Comparison
Open Charts CAWW vs DQWSBanner chart's image
CCA Industries
Price$0.89
Change+$0.01 (+1.14%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization18.79M
Dswiss
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$215
Capitalization20.69M
CAWW vs DQWS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAWW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DQWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAWW vs. DQWS commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAWW is a Hold and DQWS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CAWW: $0.89 vs. DQWS: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: CAWW and DQWS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAWW: 15% vs. DQWS: 24%
Market capitalization -- CAWW: $18.79M vs. DQWS: $20.69M
CAWW [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $18.79M. DQWS’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $20.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAWW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDQWS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAWW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DQWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CAWW and DQWS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAWW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DQWS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAWW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DQWS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DQWS is a better buy in the short-term than CAWW.

Price Growth

CAWW (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +6.45% price change this week, while DQWS (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.49% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DQWS($20.7M) has a higher market cap than CAWW($18.8M). DQWS YTD gains are higher at: 277.049 vs. CAWW (48.567). CAWW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 596K vs. DQWS (25.4K). CAWW has more cash in the bank: 374K vs. DQWS (155K). DQWS has less debt than CAWW: DQWS (84.4K) vs CAWW (2.35M). CAWW has higher revenues than DQWS: CAWW (16.6M) vs DQWS (1.67M).
CAWWDQWSCAWW / DQWS
Capitalization18.8M20.7M91%
EBITDA596K25.4K2,346%
Gain YTD48.567277.04918%
P/E RatioN/A100.00-
Revenue16.6M1.67M996%
Total Cash374K155K241%
Total Debt2.35M84.4K2,788%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAWW vs DQWS: Fundamental Ratings
CAWW
DQWS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
892
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
991
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAWW's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as DQWS (97). This means that CAWW’s stock grew similarly to DQWS’s over the last 12 months.

CAWW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DQWS (100). This means that CAWW’s stock grew similarly to DQWS’s over the last 12 months.

CAWW's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DQWS (92). This means that CAWW’s stock grew significantly faster than DQWS’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CAWW (40). This means that DQWS’s stock grew similarly to CAWW’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAWW (99). This means that DQWS’s stock grew significantly faster than CAWW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAWWDQWS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAWW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DQWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDNMY16.100.02
+0.12%
Edenred Malakoff
LIMAF49.300.02
+0.03%
Linamar Corporation
KEGX0.86N/A
N/A
Key Energy Services Inc. Del
TSIHF7.10N/A
N/A
TSI Holdings Co., Ltd.
CLSPF4.56N/A
N/A
CANADIAN LIFE COS SPLIT CORP.

CAWW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAWW and BDRFF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAWW and BDRFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAWW
1D Price
Change %
CAWW100%
N/A
BDRFF - CAWW
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BICEF - CAWW
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BICEY - CAWW
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
DQWS - CAWW
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDRFY - CAWW
-8%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More

DQWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DQWS and ETTYF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DQWS and ETTYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DQWS
1D Price
Change %
DQWS100%
N/A
ETTYF - DQWS
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HENKY - DQWS
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
BICEY - DQWS
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
HEGIY - DQWS
-2%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
BICEF - DQWS
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More