CAVA
Price
$87.34
Change
+$0.57 (+0.66%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
10.1B
30 days until earnings call
SHAK
Price
$134.86
Change
-$0.07 (-0.05%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.42B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAVA vs SHAK

Header iconCAVA vs SHAK Comparison
Open Charts CAVA vs SHAKBanner chart's image
CAVA Group
Price$87.34
Change+$0.57 (+0.66%)
Volume$1.98M
Capitalization10.1B
Shake Shack
Price$134.86
Change-$0.07 (-0.05%)
Volume$842.23K
Capitalization5.42B
CAVA vs SHAK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAVA vs. SHAK commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAVA is a Hold and SHAK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CAVA: $87.34 vs. SHAK: $134.86)
Brand notoriety: CAVA: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAVA: 47% vs. SHAK: 70%
Market capitalization -- CAVA: $10.1B vs. SHAK: $5.42B
CAVA [@Restaurants] is valued at $10.1B. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $5.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the long-term than CAVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the short-term than CAVA.

Price Growth

CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.12% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was -3.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAVA is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.89% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAVA($10.1B) has a higher market cap than SHAK($5.42B). SHAK has higher P/E ratio than CAVA: SHAK (465.03) vs CAVA (72.78). SHAK YTD gains are higher at: 3.898 vs. CAVA (-22.571). CAVA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 132M vs. SHAK (125M). CAVA has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. SHAK (313M). CAVA has less debt than SHAK: CAVA (412M) vs SHAK (824M). SHAK has higher revenues than CAVA: SHAK (1.28B) vs CAVA (1.04B).
CAVASHAKCAVA / SHAK
Capitalization10.1B5.42B186%
EBITDA132M125M106%
Gain YTD-22.5713.898-579%
P/E Ratio72.78465.0316%
Revenue1.04B1.28B81%
Total Cash369M313M118%
Total Debt412M824M50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAVASHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CWIAX71.440.09
+0.13%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc 529A
GCTCX44.570.01
+0.02%
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq C
EGINX35.47-0.05
-0.14%
Invesco EQV European Equity Investor
NDGAX23.98-0.04
-0.17%
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth A
VYCFX25.98-0.06
-0.23%
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 R

CAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAVA
1D Price
Change %
CAVA100%
+0.66%
SG - CAVA
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.30%
SHAK - CAVA
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
KRUS - CAVA
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.15%
EAT - CAVA
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
CAKE - CAVA
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
More

SHAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHAK
1D Price
Change %
SHAK100%
-0.05%
CAKE - SHAK
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
TXRH - SHAK
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
CAVA - SHAK
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
EAT - SHAK
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
KRUS - SHAK
50%
Loosely correlated
+4.15%
More