CAVA
Price
$87.34
Change
+$0.57 (+0.66%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
10.1B
30 days until earnings call
SG
Price
$14.31
Change
+$0.72 (+5.30%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.68B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAVA vs SG

Header iconCAVA vs SG Comparison
Open Charts CAVA vs SGBanner chart's image
CAVA Group
Price$87.34
Change+$0.57 (+0.66%)
Volume$1.98M
Capitalization10.1B
Sweetgreen
Price$14.31
Change+$0.72 (+5.30%)
Volume$5.42M
Capitalization1.68B
CAVA vs SG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAVA vs. SG commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAVA is a Hold and SG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CAVA: $87.34 vs. SG: $14.31)
Brand notoriety: CAVA and SG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAVA: 47% vs. SG: 113%
Market capitalization -- CAVA: $10.1B vs. SG: $1.68B
CAVA [@Restaurants] is valued at $10.1B. SG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAVA is a better buy in the long-term than SG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAVA is a better buy in the short-term than SG.

Price Growth

CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.12% price change this week, while SG (@Restaurants) price change was +4.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAVA is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

SG is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.89% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAVA($10.1B) has a higher market cap than SG($1.68B). CAVA YTD gains are higher at: -22.571 vs. SG (-55.365). CAVA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 132M vs. SG (-21.47M). CAVA has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. SG (184M). SG has less debt than CAVA: SG (329M) vs CAVA (412M). CAVA has higher revenues than SG: CAVA (1.04B) vs SG (685M).
CAVASGCAVA / SG
Capitalization10.1B1.68B600%
EBITDA132M-21.47M-615%
Gain YTD-22.571-55.36541%
P/E Ratio72.78N/A-
Revenue1.04B685M151%
Total Cash369M184M201%
Total Debt412M329M125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SG: Fundamental Ratings
SG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAVASG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBLSX14.780.02
+0.14%
Hartford Balanced Income R4
WGGNX11.57N/A
N/A
William Blair Global Leaders N
INKDX18.98N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Disciplined Growth R6
WWIDX14.73-0.06
-0.41%
Allspring Large Company Value Admin
MRRGX34.63-0.27
-0.77%
Meridian Growth Institutional

CAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAVA
1D Price
Change %
CAVA100%
+0.66%
SG - CAVA
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.30%
SHAK - CAVA
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
KRUS - CAVA
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.15%
EAT - CAVA
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
CAKE - CAVA
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
More

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
+5.30%
CAVA - SG
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
CMG - SG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
KRUS - SG
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.15%
SHAK - SG
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
PTLO - SG
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
More