CAVA
Price
$66.28
Change
-$1.27 (-1.88%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.83B
70 days until earnings call
SG
Price
$8.82
Change
-$0.28 (-3.08%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.08B
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAVA vs SG

Header iconCAVA vs SG Comparison
Open Charts CAVA vs SGBanner chart's image
CAVA Group
Price$66.28
Change-$1.27 (-1.88%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization7.83B
Sweetgreen
Price$8.82
Change-$0.28 (-3.08%)
Volume$47.53K
Capitalization1.08B
CAVA vs SG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAVA vs. SG commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAVA is a Hold and SG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (CAVA: $67.55 vs. SG: $9.10)
Brand notoriety: CAVA and SG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAVA: 59% vs. SG: 72%
Market capitalization -- CAVA: $7.83B vs. SG: $1.08B
CAVA [@Restaurants] is valued at $7.83B. SG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $223.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAVA is a better buy in the long-term than SG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SG is a better buy in the short-term than CAVA.

Price Growth

CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.43% price change this week, while SG (@Restaurants) price change was -2.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAVA is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

SG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.51% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAVA($7.83B) has a higher market cap than SG($1.08B). CAVA YTD gains are higher at: -40.115 vs. SG (-71.616). CAVA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 141M vs. SG (-29.06M). CAVA has more cash in the bank: 386M vs. SG (168M). SG has less debt than CAVA: SG (339M) vs CAVA (434M). CAVA has higher revenues than SG: CAVA (1.08B) vs SG (686M).
CAVASGCAVA / SG
Capitalization7.83B1.08B728%
EBITDA141M-29.06M-485%
Gain YTD-40.115-71.61656%
P/E Ratio57.25N/A-
Revenue1.08B686M158%
Total Cash386M168M230%
Total Debt434M339M128%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SG: Fundamental Ratings
SG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAVASG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSTZ5.160.13
+2.49%
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
FLYD6.510.14
+2.17%
MicroSectors™ Travel -3X Inv Lvgd ETNs
MFM5.190.01
+0.19%
MFS Municipal Income Trust
FCEF22.810.03
+0.13%
First Trust Income Opportunity ETF
WINN30.09-0.40
-1.31%
Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF

CAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with SHAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then SHAK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAVA
1D Price
Change %
CAVA100%
-0.97%
SHAK - CAVA
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
SG - CAVA
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
KRUS - CAVA
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
EAT - CAVA
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
BROS - CAVA
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
More

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
-1.73%
CAVA - SG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
CMG - SG
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
KRUS - SG
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
SHAK - SG
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
BROS - SG
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
More