CAVA
Price
$70.57
Change
+$2.05 (+2.99%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
8.19B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GGGSY
Price
$7.25
Change
-$0.53 (-6.81%)
Updated
Jan 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.23B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAVA vs GGGSY

Header iconCAVA vs GGGSY Comparison
Open Charts CAVA vs GGGSYBanner chart's image
CAVA Group
Price$70.57
Change+$2.05 (+2.99%)
Volume$2.53M
Capitalization8.19B
Greggs
Price$7.25
Change-$0.53 (-6.81%)
Volume$1.56K
Capitalization2.23B
CAVA vs GGGSY Comparison Chart in %
CAVA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GGGSY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAVA vs. GGGSY commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAVA is a Hold and GGGSY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CAVA: $70.57 vs. GGGSY: $7.25)
Brand notoriety: CAVA and GGGSY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAVA: 65% vs. GGGSY: 166%
Market capitalization -- CAVA: $8.19B vs. GGGSY: $2.23B
CAVA [@Restaurants] is valued at $8.19B. GGGSY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGGGSY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GGGSY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGGSY is a better buy in the long-term than CAVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGGSY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GGGSY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAVA is a better buy in the short-term than GGGSY.

Price Growth

CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а +3.93% price change this week, while GGGSY (@Restaurants) price change was -6.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAVA is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.95% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAVA($8.19B) has a higher market cap than GGGSY($2.23B). CAVA has higher P/E ratio than GGGSY: CAVA (60.84) vs GGGSY (11.48). CAVA YTD gains are higher at: 20.242 vs. GGGSY (-1.361). GGGSY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 359M vs. CAVA (149M). GGGSY has higher revenues than CAVA: GGGSY (2.08B) vs CAVA (1.13B).
CAVAGGGSYCAVA / GGGSY
Capitalization8.19B2.23B368%
EBITDA149M359M42%
Gain YTD20.242-1.361-1,488%
P/E Ratio60.8411.48530%
Revenue1.13B2.08B54%
Total Cash388MN/A-
Total Debt443MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAVAGGGSY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAVA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GGGSY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLIQX23.650.15
+0.64%
Lone Peak Value Super Institutional
NFJEX10.410.06
+0.58%
Virtus NFJ Dividend Value Inst
OGMNX62.550.21
+0.34%
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R
IINCX23.86-0.02
-0.08%
Nomura International Core Equity R6
FBONX38.36-0.07
-0.18%
American Funds American Balanced 529-F-3

CAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAVA
1D Price
Change %
CAVA100%
+2.99%
SG - CAVA
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
SHAK - CAVA
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
CAKE - CAVA
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
KRUS - CAVA
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
CMG - CAVA
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
More

GGGSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGSY and FCUL have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGSY and FCUL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGSY
1D Price
Change %
GGGSY100%
N/A
FCUL - GGGSY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPHIF - GGGSY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHSN - GGGSY
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.15%
CAVA - GGGSY
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
THCH - GGGSY
-3%
Poorly correlated
-3.57%
More