CAVA
Price
$77.89
Change
+$0.22 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.01B
52 days until earnings call
FCUL
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
324.46K
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAVA vs FCUL

Header iconCAVA vs FCUL Comparison
Open Charts CAVA vs FCULBanner chart's image
CAVA Group
Price$77.89
Change+$0.22 (+0.28%)
Volume$6.88M
Capitalization9.01B
Food Culture
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization324.46K
CAVA vs FCUL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAVA vs. FCUL commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAVA is a Buy and FCUL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CAVA: $77.89 vs. FCUL: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: CAVA and FCUL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAVA: 193% vs. FCUL: 70%
Market capitalization -- CAVA: $9.01B vs. FCUL: $324.46K
CAVA [@Restaurants] is valued at $9.01B. FCUL’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $324.46K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCUL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FCUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCUL is a better buy in the long-term than CAVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCUL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FCUL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCUL is a better buy in the short-term than CAVA.

Price Growth

CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.38% price change this week, while FCUL (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAVA is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAVA($9.01B) has a higher market cap than FCUL($324K). FCUL YTD gains are higher at: -19.091 vs. CAVA (-30.949).
CAVAFCULCAVA / FCUL
Capitalization9.01B324K2,780,556%
EBITDA132MN/A-
Gain YTD-30.949-19.091162%
P/E Ratio64.91N/A-
Revenue1.04BN/A-
Total Cash369MN/A-
Total Debt412MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCUL: Fundamental Ratings
FCUL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAVAFCUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JANP30.110.61
+2.07%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Jan
GLRY33.000.09
+0.27%
Inspire Momentum ETF
BCD33.280.02
+0.07%
abrdn Blmb AllCmdLDSK1Fr ETF
HYGV40.920.01
+0.02%
FlexShares HY Val-Scrd Bd
AZNH41.04-0.01
-0.02%
ASTRAZENECA PLC ADRHEDGED AZNH

CAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAVA
1D Price
Change %
CAVA100%
+0.28%
SG - CAVA
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
SHAK - CAVA
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
EAT - CAVA
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
KRUS - CAVA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
CAKE - CAVA
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
More

FCUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCUL and CHSN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCUL and CHSN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCUL
1D Price
Change %
FCUL100%
N/A
CHSN - FCUL
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.58%
GENK - FCUL
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
CAVA - FCUL
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
THCH - FCUL
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.43%
GGGSY - FCUL
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More