CAVA
Price
$84.24
Change
-$0.81 (-0.95%)
Updated
Aug 11, 12:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.84B
One day until earnings call
EAT
Price
$150.26
Change
-$1.71 (-1.13%)
Updated
Aug 11, 01:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.76B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAVA vs EAT

Header iconCAVA vs EAT Comparison
Open Charts CAVA vs EATBanner chart's image
CAVA Group
Price$84.24
Change-$0.81 (-0.95%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization9.84B
Brinker International
Price$150.26
Change-$1.71 (-1.13%)
Volume$500
Capitalization6.76B
CAVA vs EAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAVA vs. EAT commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAVA is a Hold and EAT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CAVA: $85.05 vs. EAT: $151.97)
Brand notoriety: CAVA and EAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAVA: 108% vs. EAT: 112%
Market capitalization -- CAVA: $9.84B vs. EAT: $6.76B
CAVA [@Restaurants] is valued at $9.84B. EAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $6.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than CAVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAVA is a better buy in the short-term than EAT.

Price Growth

CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.89% price change this week, while EAT (@Restaurants) price change was -2.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAVA is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

EAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.42% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAVA($9.84B) has a higher market cap than EAT($6.76B). CAVA has higher P/E ratio than EAT: CAVA (70.88) vs EAT (21.14). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 14.876 vs. CAVA (-24.601). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 637M vs. CAVA (132M). CAVA has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. EAT (17.5M). CAVA has less debt than EAT: CAVA (412M) vs EAT (1.72B). EAT has higher revenues than CAVA: EAT (5.13B) vs CAVA (1.04B).
CAVAEATCAVA / EAT
Capitalization9.84B6.76B146%
EBITDA132M637M21%
Gain YTD-24.60114.876-165%
P/E Ratio70.8821.14335%
Revenue1.04B5.13B20%
Total Cash369M17.5M2,109%
Total Debt412M1.72B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
9
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAVAEAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USDCNY7.15N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - China Yuan
DNLCX52.92-0.06
-0.11%
BNY Mellon Active MidCap C
BUIMX16.83-0.07
-0.41%
Buffalo Mid Cap Growth Inst
WBIRX30.63-0.17
-0.55%
William Blair International Growth R6
HKDAUD0.19-0.00
-1.36%
Hong Kong Dollar - Australian Dollar

CAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAVA
1D Price
Change %
CAVA100%
-4.33%
SG - CAVA
57%
Loosely correlated
-23.06%
SHAK - CAVA
55%
Loosely correlated
-5.85%
KRUS - CAVA
49%
Loosely correlated
-6.64%
EAT - CAVA
47%
Loosely correlated
-4.71%
CAKE - CAVA
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
More

EAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAT has been loosely correlated with DENN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EAT jumps, then DENN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAT
1D Price
Change %
EAT100%
-4.71%
DENN - EAT
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
SHAK - EAT
57%
Loosely correlated
-5.85%
TXRH - EAT
56%
Loosely correlated
-6.58%
DRI - EAT
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CAKE - EAT
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
More