CAVA
Price
$63.42
Change
-$1.72 (-2.64%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.35B
47 days until earnings call
EAT
Price
$136.96
Change
-$1.72 (-1.24%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
6.09B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAVA vs EAT

Header iconCAVA vs EAT Comparison
Open Charts CAVA vs EATBanner chart's image
CAVA Group
Price$63.42
Change-$1.72 (-2.64%)
Volume$5.17M
Capitalization7.35B
Brinker International
Price$136.96
Change-$1.72 (-1.24%)
Volume$1.09M
Capitalization6.09B
CAVA vs EAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAVA vs. EAT commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAVA is a StrongBuy and EAT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CAVA: $63.42 vs. EAT: $136.96)
Brand notoriety: CAVA and EAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAVA: 108% vs. EAT: 82%
Market capitalization -- CAVA: $7.35B vs. EAT: $6.09B
CAVA [@Restaurants] is valued at $7.35B. EAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $6.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than CAVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CAVA and EAT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.65% price change this week, while EAT (@Restaurants) price change was -5.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAVA is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

EAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAVA($7.35B) has a higher market cap than EAT($6.09B). CAVA has higher P/E ratio than EAT: CAVA (53.75) vs EAT (16.46). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 3.530 vs. CAVA (-43.777). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 720M vs. CAVA (141M). CAVA has more cash in the bank: 386M vs. EAT (18.9M). CAVA has less debt than EAT: CAVA (434M) vs EAT (1.69B). EAT has higher revenues than CAVA: EAT (5.38B) vs CAVA (1.08B).
CAVAEATCAVA / EAT
Capitalization7.35B6.09B121%
EBITDA141M720M20%
Gain YTD-43.7773.530-1,240%
P/E Ratio53.7516.46326%
Revenue1.08B5.38B20%
Total Cash386M18.9M2,042%
Total Debt434M1.69B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAVAEAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FZALX30.04N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Z
HNDDX78.64-0.18
-0.23%
Horizon Equity Premium Income Investor
HESAX46.89-0.12
-0.26%
Horizon Defensive Core Advisor
CLBEX38.46-0.13
-0.34%
American Funds American Balanced 529E
PHLCX12.33-0.07
-0.56%
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences C

CAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAVA
1D Price
Change %
CAVA100%
-2.64%
SG - CAVA
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
SHAK - CAVA
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
KRUS - CAVA
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
EAT - CAVA
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
BROS - CAVA
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
More

EAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAT has been loosely correlated with SHAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EAT jumps, then SHAK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAT
1D Price
Change %
EAT100%
-1.24%
SHAK - EAT
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
TXRH - EAT
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
CAKE - EAT
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
DRI - EAT
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
CAVA - EAT
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
More