CAVA
Price
$62.62
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.26B
45 days until earnings call
CMG
Price
$40.08
Change
+$0.75 (+1.91%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.74B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAVA vs CMG

Header iconCAVA vs CMG Comparison
Open Charts CAVA vs CMGBanner chart's image
CAVA Group
Price$62.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$34.52K
Capitalization7.26B
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Price$40.08
Change+$0.75 (+1.91%)
Volume$151.19K
Capitalization53.74B
CAVA vs CMG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAVA vs. CMG commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAVA is a StrongBuy and CMG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CAVA: $62.62 vs. CMG: $40.08)
Brand notoriety: CAVA: Not notable vs. CMG: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAVA: 31% vs. CMG: 31%
Market capitalization -- CAVA: $7.26B vs. CMG: $52.74B
CAVA [@Restaurants] is valued at $7.26B. CMG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $52.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $215.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCMG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the long-term than CAVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CAVA and CMG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.43% price change this week, while CMG (@Restaurants) price change was +1.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAVA is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

CMG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.32% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($53.7B) has a higher market cap than CAVA($7.26B). CAVA has higher P/E ratio than CMG: CAVA (53.06) vs CMG (35.47). CMG YTD gains are higher at: -33.532 vs. CAVA (-44.486). CMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.35B vs. CAVA (141M). CMG has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. CAVA (386M). CAVA has less debt than CMG: CAVA (434M) vs CMG (4.78B). CMG has higher revenues than CAVA: CMG (11.6B) vs CAVA (1.08B).
CAVACMGCAVA / CMG
Capitalization7.26B53.7B14%
EBITDA141M2.35B6%
Gain YTD-44.486-33.532133%
P/E Ratio53.0635.47150%
Revenue1.08B11.6B9%
Total Cash386M1.55B25%
Total Debt434M4.78B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
22
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAVACMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYTR21.890.03
+0.16%
Counterpoint High Yield Trend ETF
JCPI48.790.03
+0.06%
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
FBND46.28-0.03
-0.06%
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
SAT24.87-0.03
-0.13%
Saratoga Investment Corp
DWMF31.78-0.10
-0.30%
WisdomTree International Mltfctr

CAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAVA
1D Price
Change %
CAVA100%
+0.02%
SG - CAVA
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
SHAK - CAVA
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
KRUS - CAVA
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
EAT - CAVA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
BROS - CAVA
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
More

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
+1.91%
SG - CMG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
WING - CMG
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
KRUS - CMG
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
SBUX - CMG
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
CAVA - CMG
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
More