CATY
Price
$49.73
Change
-$0.48 (-0.96%)
Updated
Dec 26, 02:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.42B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CVBF
Price
$19.52
Change
-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Updated
Dec 26, 03:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.65B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CATY vs CVBF

Header iconCATY vs CVBF Comparison
Open Charts CATY vs CVBFBanner chart's image
Cathay General Ban
Price$49.73
Change-$0.48 (-0.96%)
Volume$229
Capitalization3.42B
CVB Financial
Price$19.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Volume$181
Capitalization2.65B
CATY vs CVBF Comparison Chart in %
CATY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CVBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CATY vs. CVBF commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATY is a Buy and CVBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CATY: $50.20 vs. CVBF: $19.54)
Brand notoriety: CATY and CVBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CATY: 31% vs. CVBF: 65%
Market capitalization -- CATY: $3.42B vs. CVBF: $2.65B
CATY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.42B. CVBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CATY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCVBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CATY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CVBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CATY is a better buy in the long-term than CVBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CATY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVBF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CATY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CVBF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CVBF is a better buy in the short-term than CATY.

Price Growth

CATY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.53% price change this week, while CVBF (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CATY is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

CVBF is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CATY($3.42B) has a higher market cap than CVBF($2.65B). CVBF has higher P/E ratio than CATY: CVBF (13.20) vs CATY (11.59). CATY YTD gains are higher at: 7.791 vs. CVBF (-5.843). CVBF has more cash in the bank: 195M vs. CATY (175M). CATY has less debt than CVBF: CATY (360M) vs CVBF (500M). CATY has higher revenues than CVBF: CATY (782M) vs CVBF (489M).
CATYCVBFCATY / CVBF
Capitalization3.42B2.65B129%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.791-5.843-133%
P/E Ratio11.5913.2088%
Revenue782M489M160%
Total Cash175M195M90%
Total Debt360M500M72%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CATY vs CVBF: Fundamental Ratings
CATY
CVBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5857
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3483
SMR RATING
1..100
1418
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5569
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CATY's Valuation (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CVBF (55). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to CVBF’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVBF (83). This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVBF’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CVBF (18). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to CVBF’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CVBF (58). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to CVBF’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CVBF (69). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to CVBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CATYCVBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CATY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CVBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSCKX24.720.09
+0.37%
Northern Small Cap Core K
JABRX48.470.14
+0.29%
Janus Henderson Balanced S
JSERX46.160.09
+0.20%
JPMorgan Small Cap Equity R5
HHCAX16.62-0.02
-0.12%
NexPoint Event Driven A
KNPAX110.86-0.24
-0.22%
Kinetics Paradigm Adv A

CATY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CATY has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CATY jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CATY
1D Price
Change %
CATY100%
+0.36%
UCB - CATY
90%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
UBSI - CATY
88%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
HWC - CATY
88%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
WSFS - CATY
88%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
TRMK - CATY
88%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
More