It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CATX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePROF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CATX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PROF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CATX (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +2.98% price change this week, while PROF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -7.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.21%.
CATX is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.
PROF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
CATX | PROF | CATX / PROF | |
Capitalization | 257M | 125M | 206% |
EBITDA | -94.48M | -41.56M | 227% |
Gain YTD | 8.464 | -45.140 | -19% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | 11.8M | - |
Total Cash | 192M | 35.2M | 545% |
Total Debt | 3.57M | 4.81M | 74% |
CATX | PROF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PROF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CATX (63) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that PROF’s stock grew similarly to CATX’s over the last 12 months.
PROF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CATX (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that PROF’s stock grew similarly to CATX’s over the last 12 months.
CATX's SMR Rating (97) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as PROF (99) in the null industry. This means that CATX’s stock grew similarly to PROF’s over the last 12 months.
CATX's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as PROF (91) in the null industry. This means that CATX’s stock grew similarly to PROF’s over the last 12 months.
CATX's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as PROF (100) in the null industry. This means that CATX’s stock grew similarly to PROF’s over the last 12 months.
CATX | PROF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 10 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago87% | 12 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CATX has been loosely correlated with RBOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CATX jumps, then RBOT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CATX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CATX | 100% | -2.26% | ||
RBOT - CATX | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
SHC - CATX | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
BJDX - CATX | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
MTD - CATX | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
FLGT - CATX | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PROF and MTD have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PROF and MTD's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PROF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PROF | 100% | -6.79% | ||
MTD - PROF | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
NYXH - PROF | 26% Poorly correlated | +4.04% | ||
A - PROF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
CATX - PROF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.26% | ||
QTRX - PROF | 24% Poorly correlated | +5.32% | ||
More |