CASXF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.79M
OMHLF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
135.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASXF vs OMHLF

Header iconCASXF vs OMHLF Comparison
Open Charts CASXF vs OMHLFBanner chart's image
Casa Minerals
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization3.79M
OM Holdings
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization135.22M
CASXF vs OMHLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CASXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASXF vs. OMHLF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASXF is a Hold and OMHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CASXF: $0.05 vs. OMHLF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: CASXF and OMHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASXF: 88% vs. OMHLF: 144%
Market capitalization -- CASXF: $3.79M vs. OMHLF: $135.22M
CASXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.79M. OMHLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $135.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CASXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMHLF is a better buy in the long-term than CASXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMHLF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OMHLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMHLF is a better buy in the short-term than CASXF.

Price Growth

CASXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMHLF($135M) has a higher market cap than CASXF($3.79M). CASXF has higher P/E ratio than OMHLF: CASXF (44.89) vs OMHLF (13.58). CASXF YTD gains are higher at: 28.121 vs. OMHLF (-28.082). OMHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17M vs. CASXF (-184.09K). OMHLF has higher revenues than CASXF: OMHLF (655M) vs CASXF (0).
CASXFOMHLFCASXF / OMHLF
Capitalization3.79M135M3%
EBITDA-184.09K17M-1%
Gain YTD28.121-28.082-100%
P/E Ratio44.8913.58330%
Revenue0655M-
Total Cash258KN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASXF: Fundamental Ratings
CASXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASXFOMHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
2%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CE40.780.84
+2.10%
Celanese Corp
ROST151.522.06
+1.38%
Ross Stores
GDTC1.990.02
+1.02%
CytoMed Therapeutics Limited
AXTI4.66-0.09
-1.89%
AXT
REAX4.53-0.12
-2.58%
Real Brokerage (The)

CASXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASXF has been loosely correlated with NAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASXF jumps, then NAK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASXF
1D Price
Change %
CASXF100%
N/A
NAK - CASXF
34%
Loosely correlated
+7.55%
OMHLF - CASXF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRIOF - CASXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPRGF - CASXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.70%
FTMDF - CASXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.73%
More

OMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMHLF and CASXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMHLF and CASXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMHLF
1D Price
Change %
OMHLF100%
N/A
CASXF - OMHLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRHYY - OMHLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+29.13%
NAK - OMHLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.55%
ADMLF - OMHLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FXRVF - OMHLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More