Advertisement
CASS vs SCGPY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASS is a StrongBuy and SCGPY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CASS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CASS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SCGPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CASS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCGPY’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CASS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SCGPY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CASS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -2.65% price change this week, while SCGPY (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -1.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
CASS is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.63% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| CASS | SCGPY | CASS / SCGPY | |
| Capitalization | 534M | 3.1B | 17% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 346M | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.875 | 78.475 | 1% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.56 | 45.17 | 57% |
| Revenue | 192M | 4.85B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 5.1M | 174M | 3% |
| Total Debt | 0 | 957M | - |
CASS | SCGPY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCGPY's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASS (91) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that SCGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASS’s over the last 12 months.
SCGPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASS (68) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that SCGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASS’s over the last 12 months.
CASS's SMR Rating (47) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCGPY (91) in the null industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCGPY’s over the last 12 months.
SCGPY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CASS (62) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to CASS’s over the last 12 months.
SCGPY's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as CASS (25) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to CASS’s over the last 12 months.
| CASS | SCGPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 27 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FTWO | 39.57 | 0.33 | +0.83% |
| Strive Natural Resources and SecurityETF | |||
| CADGBP | 0.54 | N/A | N/A |
| Canadian Dollar - United Kingdom Pound | |||
| MFSM | 24.88 | N/A | -0.02% |
| MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF | |||
| SMMU | 50.59 | -0.03 | -0.06% |
| PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Actv ETF | |||
| PBDC | 31.95 | -0.23 | -0.72% |
| Putnam BDC Income ETF | |||
CASS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASS has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASS jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CASS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASS | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| GHC - CASS | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| BRC - CASS | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| RGP - CASS | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| FC - CASS | 52% Loosely correlated | +5.71% | ||
| AZZ - CASS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
More | ||||
SCGPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGPY has been loosely correlated with SECUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGPY jumps, then SECUF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCGPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCGPY | 100% | N/A | ||
| SECUF - SCGPY | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| CASS - SCGPY | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| BMBLF - SCGPY | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GHC - SCGPY | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.04% | ||
| BRC - SCGPY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||