CASS
Price
$39.48
Change
-$0.20 (-0.50%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
656.64M
90 days until earnings call
FC
Price
$20.37
Change
+$0.17 (+0.84%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
520.87M
68 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CASS vs FC

Header iconCASS vs FC Comparison
Open Charts CASS vs FCBanner chart's image
Cass Information Systems
Price$39.48
Change-$0.20 (-0.50%)
Volume$37.39K
Capitalization656.64M
Franklin Covey
Price$20.37
Change+$0.17 (+0.84%)
Volume$106.3K
Capitalization520.87M
CASS vs FC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CASS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASS vs. FC commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASS is a Hold and FC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CASS: $39.48 vs. FC: $20.37)
Brand notoriety: CASS and FC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASS: 91% vs. FC: 63%
Market capitalization -- CASS: $656.64M vs. FC: $520.87M
CASS [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $656.64M. FC’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $520.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CASS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CASS is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the short-term than CASS.

Price Growth

CASS (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +0.69% price change this week, while FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +3.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASS is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

FC is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+3.18% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CASS($657M) has a higher market cap than FC($521M). FC has higher P/E ratio than CASS: FC (29.38) vs CASS (21.76). CASS YTD gains are higher at: -2.817 vs. FC (-45.796). FC has more cash in the bank: 34M vs. CASS (20.9M). CASS has less debt than FC: CASS (0) vs FC (13.2M). FC has higher revenues than CASS: FC (280M) vs CASS (187M).
CASSFCCASS / FC
Capitalization657M521M126%
EBITDAN/A35.9M-
Gain YTD-2.817-45.7966%
P/E Ratio21.7629.3874%
Revenue187M280M67%
Total Cash20.9M34M61%
Total Debt013.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASS vs FC: Fundamental Ratings
CASS
FC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
184
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4183
SMR RATING
1..100
4238
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7193
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1595
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FC's Valuation (78) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CASS (94) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to CASS’s over the last 12 months.

CASS's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (38) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CASS (42) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to CASS’s over the last 12 months.

CASS's Price Growth Rating (71) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FC (93) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

CASS's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CASS’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASSFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CASS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X84895.750000861.882800
+1.03%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY526.410.75
+0.14%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

CASS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASS has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASS jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASS
1D Price
Change %
CASS100%
-0.50%
GHC - CASS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
MSA - CASS
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
GPN - CASS
46%
Loosely correlated
-17.43%
FC - CASS
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
AZZ - CASS
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
More

FC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FC
1D Price
Change %
FC100%
+0.84%
RGP - FC
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
GHC - FC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
PHLT - FC
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
GPN - FC
43%
Loosely correlated
-17.43%
CASS - FC
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
More