CASH
Price
$74.30
Change
+$0.46 (+0.62%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.66B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WSFS
Price
$57.11
Change
+$0.06 (+0.11%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.12B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASH vs WSFS

Header iconCASH vs WSFS Comparison
Open Charts CASH vs WSFSBanner chart's image
Pathward Financial
Price$74.30
Change+$0.46 (+0.62%)
Volume$72.6K
Capitalization1.66B
WSFS Financial
Price$57.11
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
Volume$172.87K
Capitalization3.12B
CASH vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
CASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WSFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASH vs. WSFS commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASH is a Buy and WSFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CASH: $74.30 vs. WSFS: $57.11)
Brand notoriety: CASH and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASH: 34% vs. WSFS: 44%
Market capitalization -- CASH: $1.66B vs. WSFS: $3.12B
CASH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.66B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the long-term than CASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CASH is a better buy in the short-term than WSFS.

Price Growth

CASH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.48% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASH is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSFS($3.12B) has a higher market cap than CASH($1.66B). WSFS has higher P/E ratio than CASH: WSFS (11.82) vs CASH (9.44). WSFS YTD gains are higher at: 8.794 vs. CASH (1.182). CASH has less debt than WSFS: CASH (42.5M) vs WSFS (255M). WSFS has higher revenues than CASH: WSFS (1.06B) vs CASH (674M).
CASHWSFSCASH / WSFS
Capitalization1.66B3.12B53%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.1828.79413%
P/E Ratio9.4411.8280%
Revenue674M1.06B64%
Total CashN/A1.32B-
Total Debt42.5M255M17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASH vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
CASH
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
767
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3952
SMR RATING
1..100
1514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7254
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WSFS's Valuation (47) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (53). This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (52). This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's SMR Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (15). This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (56). This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (72). This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASHWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WSFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DDERX15.690.05
+0.32%
Nomura Wealth Builder R6
BMSRX14.880.03
+0.20%
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq R1
FCADX55.56N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Discv C
SOCUX21.70N/A
N/A
Spirit of America Utilities C
KMKAX73.65-0.10
-0.14%
Kinetics Market Opportunities Adv A

CASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASH has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CASH jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASH
1D Price
Change %
CASH100%
+0.62%
UCB - CASH
83%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
WSFS - CASH
82%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
FNB - CASH
81%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
BUSE - CASH
81%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
HWC - CASH
81%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
More

WSFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSFS has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSFS jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSFS
1D Price
Change %
WSFS100%
+0.11%
UCB - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
STBA - WSFS
90%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
FNB - WSFS
90%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
TRMK - WSFS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
UBSI - WSFS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
More