CASH
Price
$74.37
Change
-$1.56 (-2.05%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.29B
38 days until earnings call
FNB
Price
$13.62
Change
-$0.35 (-2.51%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.97B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASH vs FNB

Header iconCASH vs FNB Comparison
Open Charts CASH vs FNBBanner chart's image
Pathward Financial
Price$74.37
Change-$1.56 (-2.05%)
Volume$143.04K
Capitalization1.29B
FNB
Price$13.62
Change-$0.35 (-2.51%)
Volume$2.99M
Capitalization4.97B
CASH vs FNB Comparison Chart
Loading...
CASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASH vs. FNB commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASH is a StrongBuy and FNB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CASH: $74.37 vs. FNB: $13.62)
Brand notoriety: CASH and FNB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASH: 73% vs. FNB: 107%
Market capitalization -- CASH: $1.29B vs. FNB: $4.97B
CASH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.29B. FNB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFNB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CASH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FNB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the long-term than CASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FNB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CASH is a better buy in the short-term than FNB.

Price Growth

CASH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.37% price change this week, while FNB (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASH is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

FNB is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNB($4.97B) has a higher market cap than CASH($1.29B). FNB has higher P/E ratio than CASH: FNB (10.55) vs CASH (8.25). CASH YTD gains are higher at: 1.211 vs. FNB (-6.286). CASH has less debt than FNB: CASH (33.6M) vs FNB (3.98B). FNB has higher revenues than CASH: FNB (1.57B) vs CASH (588M).
CASHFNBCASH / FNB
Capitalization1.29B4.97B26%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.211-6.286-19%
P/E Ratio8.2510.5578%
Revenue588M1.57B37%
Total CashN/A447M-
Total Debt33.6M3.98B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASH vs FNB: Fundamental Ratings
CASH
FNB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2227
SMR RATING
1..100
1210
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2349
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNB's Valuation (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASH (94) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (27) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (12) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASHFNB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMRFX11.77-0.01
-0.08%
MassMutual Select TRP Real Asset I
GVIRX17.15-0.15
-0.87%
Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium Inv
VTWIX255.10-3.16
-1.22%
Vanguard Total World Stock Index I
STITX7.73-0.11
-1.40%
Virtus SGA International Growth I
DBMZX29.08-0.46
-1.56%
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr Z

CASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASH has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CASH jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASH
1D Price
Change %
CASH100%
-1.99%
WSFS - CASH
85%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
UBSI - CASH
85%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
FNB - CASH
85%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
FFBC - CASH
84%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
BANR - CASH
84%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
More

FNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNB has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNB jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNB
1D Price
Change %
FNB100%
-2.51%
WTFC - FNB
94%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
ASB - FNB
93%
Closely correlated
-2.77%
SNV - FNB
93%
Closely correlated
-2.92%
HWC - FNB
93%
Closely correlated
-2.57%
ZION - FNB
92%
Closely correlated
-2.65%
More