CASH
Price
$71.21
Change
+$1.45 (+2.08%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.62B
3 days until earnings call
FCNCB
Price
$1510.00
Change
+$30.00 (+2.03%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
21.72B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASH vs FCNCB

Header iconCASH vs FCNCB Comparison
Open Charts CASH vs FCNCBBanner chart's image
Pathward Financial
Price$71.21
Change+$1.45 (+2.08%)
Volume$203.44K
Capitalization1.62B
First Citizens BancShares
Price$1510.00
Change+$30.00 (+2.03%)
Volume$67
Capitalization21.72B
CASH vs FCNCB Comparison Chart in %
CASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCNCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASH vs. FCNCB commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASH is a Hold and FCNCB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CASH: $71.21 vs. FCNCB: $1510.00)
Brand notoriety: CASH and FCNCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASH: 114% vs. FCNCB: 72%
Market capitalization -- CASH: $1.62B vs. FCNCB: $21.72B
CASH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.62B. FCNCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $21.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFCNCB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CASH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FCNCB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCNCB is a better buy in the long-term than CASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCNCB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • FCNCB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCNCB is a better buy in the short-term than CASH.

Price Growth

CASH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.41% price change this week, while FCNCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASH is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNCB($21.7B) has a higher market cap than CASH($1.62B). CASH has higher P/E ratio than FCNCB: CASH (10.26) vs FCNCB (8.92). CASH YTD gains are higher at: -3.026 vs. FCNCB (-13.859). CASH has less debt than FCNCB: CASH (33.4M) vs FCNCB (38B). FCNCB has higher revenues than CASH: FCNCB (9.49B) vs CASH (592M).
CASHFCNCBCASH / FCNCB
Capitalization1.62B21.7B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.026-13.85922%
P/E Ratio10.268.92115%
Revenue592M9.49B6%
Total CashN/A812M-
Total Debt33.4M38B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASH vs FCNCB: Fundamental Ratings
CASH
FCNCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6067
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2819
SMR RATING
1..100
156
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7781
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5359
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCNCB's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CASH (65) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCNCB’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as CASH (28) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCNCB’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCB's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CASH (15) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCNCB’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's Price Growth Rating (77) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCNCB (81) in the null industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to FCNCB’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCNCB (59) in the null industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to FCNCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASHFCNCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCNCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVW120.400.64
+0.53%
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
GDIV16.010.07
+0.47%
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
FMAR46.370.17
+0.38%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Mar
XFEB34.940.08
+0.23%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Feb
NOVM32.18N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF – Nov

CASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASH has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CASH jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASH
1D Price
Change %
CASH100%
+2.08%
WSFS - CASH
87%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
UCB - CASH
85%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
FNB - CASH
85%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
TCBK - CASH
84%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
HWC - CASH
84%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
More

FCNCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCNCB has been closely correlated with FCNCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCNCB jumps, then FCNCA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCNCB
1D Price
Change %
FCNCB100%
+2.03%
FCNCA - FCNCB
70%
Closely correlated
+3.44%
CASH - FCNCB
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
FNB - FCNCB
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.00%
FHB - FCNCB
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
AX - FCNCB
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
More