CASH
Price
$75.30
Change
-$1.34 (-1.75%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.73B
66 days until earnings call
FCNCB
Price
$1655.00
Change
-$9.99 (-0.60%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
23.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASH vs FCNCB

Header iconCASH vs FCNCB Comparison
Open Charts CASH vs FCNCBBanner chart's image
Pathward Financial
Price$75.30
Change-$1.34 (-1.75%)
Volume$243.69K
Capitalization1.73B
First Citizens BancShares
Price$1655.00
Change-$9.99 (-0.60%)
Volume$193
Capitalization23.96B
CASH vs FCNCB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCNCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CASH vs. FCNCB commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASH is a Hold and FCNCB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CASH: $75.30 vs. FCNCB: $1655.00)
Brand notoriety: CASH and FCNCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASH: 122% vs. FCNCB: 151%
Market capitalization -- CASH: $1.73B vs. FCNCB: $23.96B
CASH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.73B. FCNCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $23.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFCNCB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CASH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FCNCB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CASH is a better buy in the long-term than FCNCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCNCB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FCNCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CASH and FCNCB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CASH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.02% price change this week, while FCNCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNCB($24B) has a higher market cap than CASH($1.73B). CASH (9.96) and FCNCB (9.77) have similar P/E ratio . CASH YTD gains are higher at: 2.477 vs. FCNCB (-5.695). CASH has less debt than FCNCB: CASH (33.4M) vs FCNCB (38.3B).
CASHFCNCBCASH / FCNCB
Capitalization1.73B24B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.477-5.695-43%
P/E Ratio9.969.77102%
RevenueN/A9.59B-
Total CashN/A814M-
Total Debt33.4M38.3B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASH vs FCNCB: Fundamental Ratings
CASH
FCNCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
567
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2515
SMR RATING
1..100
156
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5975
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4454
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCNCB's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CASH (65) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCNCB’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as CASH (25) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCNCB’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCB's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CASH (15) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCNCB’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCNCB (75) in the null industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to FCNCB’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCNCB (54) in the null industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to FCNCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASHFCNCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCNCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JICAX82.88-0.13
-0.16%
JPMorgan US Sustainable Leaders A
OGINX46.19-0.12
-0.26%
Invesco Global Opportunities R
FNILX23.15-0.06
-0.26%
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index
TQVAX18.55-0.06
-0.32%
T. Rowe Price Integrated US LCV Eq Adv
DDERX15.63-0.07
-0.45%
Macquarie Wealth Builder R6

CASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASH has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CASH jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASH
1D Price
Change %
CASH100%
-1.75%
WSFS - CASH
85%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
BANR - CASH
84%
Closely correlated
-2.75%
FNB - CASH
84%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
UCB - CASH
83%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
TCBK - CASH
83%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
More

FCNCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCNCB has been closely correlated with FCNCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCNCB jumps, then FCNCA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCNCB
1D Price
Change %
FCNCB100%
-0.60%
FCNCA - FCNCB
71%
Closely correlated
-2.80%
CASH - FCNCB
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
FNB - FCNCB
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
FHB - FCNCB
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.27%
WBS - FCNCB
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
More