Advertisement
CARZ vs RMBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARZ is a Buy and RMBS is a Buy.
RMBS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CARZ | RMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SNOU | 43.52 | 0.39 | +0.90% |
| T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF | |||
| SDIV | 24.29 | 0.06 | +0.25% |
| Global X SuperDividend™ ETF | |||
| GARA | 25.36 | N/A | N/A |
| Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Bldr ETF | |||
| DURA | 34.32 | -0.05 | -0.16% |
| VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF | |||
| HYTR | 21.72 | -0.04 | -0.17% |
| Counterpoint High Yield Trend ETF | |||
CARZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARZ has been closely correlated with NXPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CARZ jumps, then NXPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CARZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| NXPI - CARZ | 73% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| MU - CARZ | 72% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| ST - CARZ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| MCHP - CARZ | 70% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| RMBS - CARZ | 69% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||
RMBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMBS | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| LRCX - RMBS | 77% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| AMKR - RMBS | 77% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| KLIC - RMBS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| VECO - RMBS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| KLAC - RMBS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||