CARG
Price
$35.38
Change
+$0.60 (+1.73%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.51B
68 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$57.05
Change
-$0.23 (-0.40%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.46B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CARG vs RUSHA

Header iconCARG vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts CARG vs RUSHABanner chart's image
CarGurus
Price$35.38
Change+$0.60 (+1.73%)
Volume$1.07M
Capitalization3.51B
Rush Enterprises
Price$57.05
Change-$0.23 (-0.40%)
Volume$228.55K
Capitalization4.46B
CARG vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CARG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CARG vs. RUSHA commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARG is a Buy and RUSHA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CARG: $35.38 vs. RUSHA: $57.05)
Brand notoriety: CARG and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CARG: 109% vs. RUSHA: 60%
Market capitalization -- CARG: $3.51B vs. RUSHA: $4.46B
CARG [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $3.51B. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CARG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CARG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than CARG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CARG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CARG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CARG is a better buy in the short-term than RUSHA.

Price Growth

CARG (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +3.27% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -2.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

CARG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-1.20% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHA($4.46B) has a higher market cap than CARG($3.51B). CARG has higher P/E ratio than RUSHA: CARG (28.31) vs RUSHA (16.25). RUSHA YTD gains are higher at: 5.203 vs. CARG (-3.175). CARG has less debt than RUSHA: CARG (195M) vs RUSHA (1.75B).
CARGRUSHACARG / RUSHA
Capitalization3.51B4.46B79%
EBITDA213MN/A-
Gain YTD-3.1755.203-61%
P/E Ratio28.3116.25174%
Revenue919MN/A-
Total Cash231MN/A-
Total Debt195M1.75B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CARG vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
CARG
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1968
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8717
SMR RATING
1..100
3457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10028
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (35) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CARG (85) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CARG’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CARG (87) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew significantly faster than CARG’s over the last 12 months.

CARG's SMR Rating (34) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RUSHA (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CARG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

CARG's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RUSHA (49) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CARG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CARG (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew significantly faster than CARG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CARGRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CARG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALAFX100.410.97
+0.98%
Alger Focus Equity A
GINDX31.150.24
+0.78%
Gotham Index Plus Institutional
RSIYX17.30-0.02
-0.12%
Victory RS Investors Y
LRSYX20.92-0.07
-0.33%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value I
OIEIX25.35-0.14
-0.55%
JPMorgan Equity Income A

CARG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARG has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CARG jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CARG
1D Price
Change %
CARG100%
+1.73%
AN - CARG
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
RUSHA - CARG
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
SAH - CARG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
ABG - CARG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
LAD - CARG
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
-0.40%
RUSHB - RUSHA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
AN - RUSHA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
GPI - RUSHA
68%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
ABG - RUSHA
68%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
PAG - RUSHA
66%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
More