Advertisement
CARG vs FVRR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARG is a StrongBuy and FVRR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CARG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFVRR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CARG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FVRR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CARG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FVRR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CARG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FVRR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CARG (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +4.67% price change this week, while FVRR (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +6.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.08%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
CARG is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
FVRR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.45% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
@Internet Software/Services (-1.27% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| CARG | FVRR | CARG / FVRR | |
| Capitalization | 3.46B | 825M | 419% |
| EBITDA | 213M | 29.8M | 715% |
| Gain YTD | -2.436 | -30.823 | 8% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.48 | 37.22 | 66% |
| Revenue | 919M | 419M | 219% |
| Total Cash | 231M | 724M | 32% |
| Total Debt | 195M | 464M | 42% |
CARG | FVRR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FVRR's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CARG (84) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FVRR’s stock grew similarly to CARG’s over the last 12 months.
CARG's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FVRR (100) in the null industry. This means that CARG’s stock grew similarly to FVRR’s over the last 12 months.
CARG's SMR Rating (33) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FVRR (84) in the null industry. This means that CARG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FVRR’s over the last 12 months.
CARG's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FVRR (63) in the null industry. This means that CARG’s stock grew similarly to FVRR’s over the last 12 months.
FVRR's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CARG (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FVRR’s stock grew similarly to CARG’s over the last 12 months.
| CARG | FVRR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSRKX | 21.40 | 0.13 | +0.61% |
| Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc R | |||
| JAMRX | 101.71 | -0.09 | -0.09% |
| Janus Henderson Research T | |||
| GSXAX | 38.82 | -0.11 | -0.28% |
| abrdn US Small Cap Equity A | |||
| STNFX | 51.74 | -0.16 | -0.31% |
| Allspring Large Cap Growth Inst | |||
| IRSEX | 16.14 | -0.13 | -0.80% |
| Macquarie Real Estate Securities R6 | |||
CARG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARG has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CARG jumps, then AN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CARG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARG | 100% | +2.95% | ||
| AN - CARG | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| MAX - CARG | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| LAD - CARG | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| ABG - CARG | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.11% | ||
| RUSHA - CARG | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
More | ||||
FVRR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVRR has been loosely correlated with CARG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FVRR jumps, then CARG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FVRR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FVRR | 100% | -2.01% | ||
| CARG - FVRR | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| UPWK - FVRR | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.07% | ||
| NRDS - FVRR | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| SMWB - FVRR | 43% Loosely correlated | -7.78% | ||
| META - FVRR | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||