CARE
Price
$17.99
Change
+$0.45 (+2.57%)
Updated
Jan 23, 01:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
285.02M
Earnings call today
SFST
Price
$36.11
Change
-$0.13 (-0.36%)
Updated
Jan 23, 12:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
247.62M
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CARE vs SFST

Header iconCARE vs SFST Comparison
Open Charts CARE vs SFSTBanner chart's image
Carter Bankshares
Price$17.99
Change+$0.45 (+2.57%)
Volume$100
Capitalization285.02M
Southern First Bancshares
Price$36.11
Change-$0.13 (-0.36%)
Volume$100
Capitalization247.62M
CARE vs SFST Comparison Chart
Loading...
CARE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CARE vs. SFST commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARE is a Hold and SFST is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CARE: $17.74 vs. SFST: $37.50)
Brand notoriety: CARE and SFST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CARE: 67% vs. SFST: 105%
Market capitalization -- CARE: $285.02M vs. SFST: $247.62M
CARE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $285.02M. SFST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $247.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CARE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CARE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CARE is a better buy in the long-term than SFST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CARE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFST’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CARE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SFST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CARE is a better buy in the short-term than SFST.

Price Growth

CARE (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.17% price change this week, while SFST (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CARE is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

SFST is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.95% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CARE($285M) has a higher market cap than SFST($248M). SFST has higher P/E ratio than CARE: SFST (18.29) vs CARE (12.38). CARE YTD gains are higher at: 0.853 vs. SFST (-5.660). SFST has less debt than CARE: SFST (311M) vs CARE (393M). CARE has higher revenues than SFST: CARE (137M) vs SFST (87.5M).
CARESFSTCARE / SFST
Capitalization285M248M115%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.853-5.660-15%
P/E Ratio12.3818.2968%
Revenue137M87.5M157%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt393M311M126%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CARE vs SFST: Fundamental Ratings
CARE
SFST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
3746
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
847
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFST's Valuation (58) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CARE (65). This means that SFST’s stock grew similarly to CARE’s over the last 12 months.

SFST's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CARE (100). This means that SFST’s stock grew similarly to CARE’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's SMR Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFST (46). This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to SFST’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFST (56). This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to SFST’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFST (47). This means that CARE’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CARESFST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CARE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

CARE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARE has been closely correlated with CFB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CARE jumps, then CFB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CARE
1D Price
Change %
CARE100%
+2.19%
CFB - CARE
69%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
AX - CARE
68%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
BWB - CARE
68%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
TCBI - CARE
68%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
SFST - CARE
67%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
More

SFST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFST has been closely correlated with AX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFST jumps, then AX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFST
1D Price
Change %
SFST100%
+1.41%
AX - SFST
70%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
CFB - SFST
69%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
BWB - SFST
68%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
TCBI - SFST
68%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
CARE - SFST
67%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
More