CARE
Price
$17.20
Change
-$0.26 (-1.49%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
285.02M
59 days until earnings call
FVCB
Price
$11.05
Change
-$0.59 (-5.07%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
217.74M
52 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CARE vs FVCB

Header iconCARE vs FVCB Comparison
Open Charts CARE vs FVCBBanner chart's image
Carter Bankshares
Price$17.20
Change-$0.26 (-1.49%)
Volume$72.93K
Capitalization285.02M
FVCBank
Price$11.05
Change-$0.59 (-5.07%)
Volume$36.16K
Capitalization217.74M
CARE vs FVCB Comparison Chart
Loading...
CARE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FVCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CARE vs. FVCB commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARE is a Hold and FVCB is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CARE: $17.20 vs. FVCB: $11.05)
Brand notoriety: CARE and FVCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CARE: 105% vs. FVCB: 181%
Market capitalization -- CARE: $285.02M vs. FVCB: $217.74M
CARE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $285.02M. FVCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $217.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CARE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFVCB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CARE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FVCB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CARE is a better buy in the long-term than FVCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CARE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FVCB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CARE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FVCB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CARE is a better buy in the short-term than FVCB.

Price Growth

CARE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.39% price change this week, while FVCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -8.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

CARE is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

FVCB is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CARE($285M) has a higher market cap than FVCB($218M). FVCB has higher P/E ratio than CARE: FVCB (57.21) vs CARE (12.38). CARE YTD gains are higher at: -2.217 vs. FVCB (-12.092). FVCB has less debt than CARE: FVCB (114M) vs CARE (393M). CARE has higher revenues than FVCB: CARE (137M) vs FVCB (42.1M).
CAREFVCBCARE / FVCB
Capitalization285M218M131%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.217-12.09218%
P/E Ratio12.3857.2122%
Revenue137M42.1M325%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt393M114M345%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CARE vs FVCB: Fundamental Ratings
CARE
FVCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1765
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
3760
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5477
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FVCB's Valuation (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CARE (54). This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to CARE’s over the last 12 months.

FVCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CARE (100). This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to CARE’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's SMR Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (60). This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (77). This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FVCB (99). This means that CARE’s stock grew significantly faster than FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAREFVCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CARE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FVCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

CARE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARE has been closely correlated with CFB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CARE jumps, then CFB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CARE
1D Price
Change %
CARE100%
-1.49%
CFB - CARE
69%
Closely correlated
-2.77%
AX - CARE
68%
Closely correlated
-2.92%
SFST - CARE
67%
Closely correlated
-3.32%
BWB - CARE
67%
Closely correlated
-1.61%
TCBI - CARE
67%
Closely correlated
-1.83%
More

FVCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVCB has been loosely correlated with BWB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FVCB jumps, then BWB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FVCB
1D Price
Change %
FVCB100%
-5.07%
BWB - FVCB
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
CARE - FVCB
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
SFST - FVCB
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
NBBK - FVCB
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
TCBI - FVCB
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
More