Advertisement
CARE vs COFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARE is a Hold and COFS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CARE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCOFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CARE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- COFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CARE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CARE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- COFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CARE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.36% price change this week, while COFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
CARE is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
COFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+1.40% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| CARE | COFS | CARE / COFS | |
| Capitalization | 285M | 207M | 138% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.899 | -16.036 | -18% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.38 | 9.50 | 130% |
| Revenue | 137M | 80.8M | 170% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 144M | - |
| Total Debt | 393M | 236M | 167% |
CARE | COFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CARE's Valuation (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (59) in the null industry. This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.
CARE's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COFS (68) in the null industry. This means that CARE’s stock grew somewhat faster than COFS’s over the last 12 months.
CARE's SMR Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (47) in the null industry. This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.
CARE's Price Growth Rating (90) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (90) in the null industry. This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.
COFS's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CARE (92) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew significantly faster than CARE’s over the last 12 months.
| CARE | COFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 23 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 7 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
CARE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARE has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CARE jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CARE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARE | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| FMBH - CARE | 83% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| HOPE - CARE | 83% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| TRMK - CARE | 83% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| CVBF - CARE | 83% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| CTBI - CARE | 82% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||
COFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COFS has been loosely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COFS jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COFS | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| EFSC - COFS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| BHRB - COFS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| OBK - COFS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| CFFN - COFS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| CARE - COFS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||