CAOVY
Price
$8.66
Change
-$0.26 (-2.91%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.77B
LGFRY
Price
$12.15
Change
-$0.05 (-0.41%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
16.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAOVY vs LGFRY

Header iconCAOVY vs LGFRY Comparison
Open Charts CAOVY vs LGFRYBanner chart's image
China Overseas Land & Investment
Price$8.66
Change-$0.26 (-2.91%)
Volume$15.72K
Capitalization25.77B
Longfor Group Holdings
Price$12.15
Change-$0.05 (-0.41%)
Volume$1.95K
Capitalization16.88B
CAOVY vs LGFRY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAOVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGFRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAOVY vs. LGFRY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAOVY is a Hold and LGFRY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CAOVY: $8.66 vs. LGFRY: $12.15)
Brand notoriety: CAOVY and LGFRY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAOVY: 326% vs. LGFRY: 31%
Market capitalization -- CAOVY: $25.77B vs. LGFRY: $16.88B
CAOVY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $25.77B. LGFRY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $16.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAOVY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLGFRY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAOVY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LGFRY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGFRY is a better buy in the long-term than CAOVY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAOVY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGFRY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAOVY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LGFRY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LGFRY is a better buy in the short-term than CAOVY.

Price Growth

CAOVY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -7.79% price change this week, while LGFRY (@Real Estate Development) price change was -1.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAOVY($25.8B) has a higher market cap than LGFRY($16.9B). CAOVY has higher P/E ratio than LGFRY: CAOVY (7.92) vs LGFRY (4.39). CAOVY YTD gains are higher at: 15.719 vs. LGFRY (-1.716). LGFRY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 47.5B vs. CAOVY (37.7B). LGFRY has higher revenues than CAOVY: LGFRY (251B) vs CAOVY (180B).
CAOVYLGFRYCAOVY / LGFRY
Capitalization25.8B16.9B153%
EBITDA37.7B47.5B79%
Gain YTD15.719-1.716-916%
P/E Ratio7.924.39180%
Revenue180B251B72%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAOVY vs LGFRY: Fundamental Ratings
CAOVY
LGFRY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9916
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1649
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGFRY's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as CAOVY (22). This means that LGFRY’s stock grew similarly to CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

LGFRY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CAOVY (100). This means that LGFRY’s stock grew similarly to CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

LGFRY's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAOVY (99). This means that LGFRY’s stock grew significantly faster than CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

CAOVY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as LGFRY (59). This means that CAOVY’s stock grew similarly to LGFRY’s over the last 12 months.

CAOVY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGFRY (49). This means that CAOVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGFRY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAOVYLGFRY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAOVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGFRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRIB0.750.07
+10.12%
Trinity Biotech plc
MLCO8.560.13
+1.54%
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
FMBH39.710.30
+0.76%
First Mid Bancshares
LYV149.270.16
+0.11%
Live Nation Entertainment
POWW1.31N/A
N/A
Outdoor Holding Company

CAOVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAOVY has been closely correlated with LGFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAOVY jumps, then LGFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAOVY
1D Price
Change %
CAOVY100%
-2.91%
LGFRY - CAOVY
70%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
HLPPY - CAOVY
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
HLDCY - CAOVY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
BEKE - CAOVY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
XIN - CAOVY
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More

LGFRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGFRY has been closely correlated with HLPPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LGFRY jumps, then HLPPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGFRY
1D Price
Change %
LGFRY100%
-0.37%
HLPPY - LGFRY
70%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
CAOVY - LGFRY
70%
Closely correlated
-2.91%
HLDCY - LGFRY
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
XIN - LGFRY
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
HYSNY - LGFRY
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More