CANOF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.03 (-11.54%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
10.32M
CLZNF
Price
$9.34
Change
-$1.65 (-15.01%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.29B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CANOF vs CLZNF

Header iconCANOF vs CLZNF Comparison
Open Charts CANOF vs CLZNFBanner chart's image
California Nanotechnologies
Price$0.23
Change-$0.03 (-11.54%)
Volume$45.11K
Capitalization10.32M
Clariant AG
Price$9.34
Change-$1.65 (-15.01%)
Volume$2.51K
Capitalization3.29B
CANOF vs CLZNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CANOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CANOF vs. CLZNF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANOF is a Hold and CLZNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CANOF: $0.23 vs. CLZNF: $9.34)
Brand notoriety: CANOF and CLZNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CANOF: 71% vs. CLZNF: 65%
Market capitalization -- CANOF: $10.32M vs. CLZNF: $3.29B
CANOF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $10.32M. CLZNF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $3.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $220.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CANOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLZNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CANOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLZNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CANOF and CLZNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CANOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLZNF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CANOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CLZNF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CANOF is a better buy in the short-term than CLZNF.

Price Growth

CANOF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -5.09% price change this week, while CLZNF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -15.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.30% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLZNF($3.29B) has a higher market cap than CANOF($10.3M). CANOF has higher P/E ratio than CLZNF: CANOF (196.27) vs CLZNF (22.09). CLZNF YTD gains are higher at: -26.803 vs. CANOF (-58.556). CLZNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 599M vs. CANOF (-340.99K). CLZNF has more cash in the bank: 449M vs. CANOF (463K). CANOF has less debt than CLZNF: CANOF (1.55M) vs CLZNF (2.05B). CLZNF has higher revenues than CANOF: CLZNF (4.06B) vs CANOF (5.19M).
CANOFCLZNFCANOF / CLZNF
Capitalization10.3M3.29B0%
EBITDA-340.99K599M-0%
Gain YTD-58.556-26.803218%
P/E Ratio196.2722.09889%
Revenue5.19M4.06B0%
Total Cash463K449M0%
Total Debt1.55M2.05B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CANOF vs CLZNF: Fundamental Ratings
CANOF
CLZNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5698
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85100
SMR RATING
1..100
9995
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9176
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
192
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLZNF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CANOF (92). This means that CLZNF’s stock grew significantly faster than CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

CANOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as CLZNF (100). This means that CANOF’s stock grew similarly to CLZNF’s over the last 12 months.

CLZNF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CANOF (99). This means that CLZNF’s stock grew similarly to CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

CLZNF's Price Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as CANOF (91). This means that CLZNF’s stock grew similarly to CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

CANOF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLZNF (92). This means that CANOF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLZNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CANOFCLZNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CANOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXLS44.980.85
+1.93%
ExlService Holdings
MG9.73-0.06
-0.61%
Mistras Group
TCBK45.12-0.52
-1.14%
TriCo Bancshares
DMYY12.23-0.14
-1.15%
dMY Squared Technology Group
MSFT495.00-12.97
-2.55%
Microsoft Corp

CANOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CANOF and CGIFF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CANOF and CGIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANOF
1D Price
Change %
CANOF100%
-10.76%
CGIFF - CANOF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
BNTGY - CANOF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
BRRDF - CANOF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BASFY - CANOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
CLZNF - CANOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-15.01%
More

CLZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLZNF and ZEOOF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLZNF and ZEOOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLZNF
1D Price
Change %
CLZNF100%
-15.01%
ZEOOF - CLZNF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVYSF - CLZNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGIFF - CLZNF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
COIHF - CLZNF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COVTY - CLZNF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
More