CANG vs TLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANG is a Buy and TLF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CANG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CANG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +75.82% price change this week, while TLF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -3.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -5.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.07%.
Reported Earning Dates
CANG is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
TLF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-5.55% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| CANG | TLF | CANG / TLF | |
| Capitalization | 205M | 39.1M | 524% |
| EBITDA | -248.35M | 9.04M | -2,748% |
| Gain YTD | 684.314 | 9.390 | 7,288% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.92 | 10.33 | 202% |
| Revenue | 2.12B | 76.2M | 2,785% |
| Total Cash | 2.65B | 12.2M | 21,680% |
| Total Debt | 431M | 9.43M | 4,572% |
CANG | TLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 1 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 41 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TLF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CANG (68) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TLF’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.
CANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLF (100) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLF’s over the last 12 months.
TLF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as CANG (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TLF’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.
CANG's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TLF (44) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to TLF’s over the last 12 months.
CANG's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLF (50) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLF’s over the last 12 months.
| CANG | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
CANG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CANG and RUSHB have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CANG and RUSHB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CANG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CANG | 100% | +15.77% | ||
| RUSHB - CANG | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.03% | ||
| BARK - CANG | 21% Poorly correlated | -9.59% | ||
| CASY - CANG | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.61% | ||
| RUSHA - CANG | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.11% | ||
| KAR - CANG | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
More | ||||
TLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TLF and CANG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLF and CANG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLF | 100% | -1.69% | ||
| CANG - TLF | 20% Poorly correlated | +15.77% | ||
| MNSO - TLF | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
| SNROF - TLF | 7% Poorly correlated | +8.36% | ||
| ACVA - TLF | 6% Poorly correlated | -4.13% | ||
| UXIN - TLF | 5% Poorly correlated | -9.81% | ||
More | ||||