CANG
Price
$5.52
Change
+$0.48 (+9.52%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
523.35M
84 days until earnings call
LGHL
Price
$1.55
Change
+$0.20 (+14.81%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CANG vs LGHL

Header iconCANG vs LGHL Comparison
Open Charts CANG vs LGHLBanner chart's image
Cango
Price$5.52
Change+$0.48 (+9.52%)
Volume$2.53K
Capitalization523.35M
Lion Group Holding
Price$1.55
Change+$0.20 (+14.81%)
Volume$40.79K
Capitalization2.96M
CANG vs LGHL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CANG vs. LGHL commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANG is a StrongBuy and LGHL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CANG: $5.04 vs. LGHL: $1.35)
Brand notoriety: CANG and LGHL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CANG: 160% vs. LGHL: 16%
Market capitalization -- CANG: $523.35M vs. LGHL: $2.96M
CANG [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $523.35M. LGHL’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLGHL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LGHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CANG is a better buy in the long-term than LGHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CANG’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGHL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CANG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LGHL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CANG is a better buy in the short-term than LGHL.

Price Growth

CANG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +5.66% price change this week, while LGHL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -17.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +12.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

CANG is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+12.34% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CANG($523M) has a higher market cap than LGHL($2.96M). CANG YTD gains are higher at: 14.545 vs. LGHL (-85.789). CANG has more cash in the bank: 2.52B vs. LGHL (29M). LGHL has less debt than CANG: LGHL (2.8M) vs CANG (834M).
CANGLGHLCANG / LGHL
Capitalization523M2.96M17,681%
EBITDA5.02MN/A-
Gain YTD14.545-85.789-17%
P/E Ratio11.43N/A-
Revenue1.79BN/A-
Total Cash2.52B29M8,693%
Total Debt834M2.8M29,786%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CANG: Fundamental Ratings
CANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CANGLGHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OI12.770.14
+1.11%
O-I Glass
MNY1.690.01
+0.60%
MoneyHero Limited
ACI19.06-0.04
-0.21%
Albertsons Companies
FRBA16.92-0.07
-0.41%
First Bank
SLRX4.71-0.03
-0.63%
Salarius Pharmaceuticals Inc

CANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CANG has been loosely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CANG jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANG
1D Price
Change %
CANG100%
+6.55%
MARA - CANG
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
HUT - CANG
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
BITF - CANG
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.20%
CLSK - CANG
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
BTBT - CANG
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More

LGHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGHL and TOP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGHL and TOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGHL
1D Price
Change %
LGHL100%
+6.30%
TOP - LGHL
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
MEGL - LGHL
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
SRL - LGHL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CANG - LGHL
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.55%
FUFU - LGHL
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
More